canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england


Levitra instead of such famous love-drug Viagra?canadarxgeneric.com

Tag Archive for 'Water-Plan'

Casey Cagle on Water and the 2008 Session

This interview with Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle took place last week and my apologies to Casey for not posting it sooner. It took place the day before a significant court ruling in the “water wars” between Georgia, Alabama and Florida. That decision dealt a significant blow to Governor Perdue’s assertions that Georgia, not Alabama, not Florida, not the Corps of Engineers, would control the flow of water out of Lake Lanier. According to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Georgia has no right to take any water out of Lake Lanier for drinking water use without the approval of Congress. The Court’s decision is well worth a read. The main opinion is less than 20 pages, but it gives a good overview of the water wars that have swirled around Lake Lanier.

When you consider that Lake Lanier presently supplies almost a third of the water used by Georgians (all of them in metro Atlanta), this decision could have an immediate and significant impact on the metro area.

I was amazed that the Statewide Water Plan made it through the legislature with such speed and has already been signed by the Governor. With all the controversy surrounding the Plan (at least I thought there was controversy), I assumed the Plan was going to be the subject of hearings and debate. What happened? Casey says the universal support is the result of the good job the Water Council did in developing the Plan. He gives his full stamp of approval to the Plan and assured me that Atlanta was not going to steal my South Georgia water. What more can I ask for?

Only time will tell. Another reason for the lack of opposition may be due to the fact that there really isn’t much to the Plan. It doesn’t constitute a law or a regulation. It is more of an organizational plan that will have to be judged after the dozens of members are appointed and begin their work. I doubt the Plan will have any immediate impact on the water problems.

As for opposition to the Plan, Casey referred to a “very radical environmental viewpoint” that was asserted by some opponents as a scare tactic. I assume this refers to the Riverkeeper organizations. Whether their concerns prove justified, only time will tell!

As for the long-term water solution, there are 11 reservoirs in the planning stage, primarily for municipal water supplies. Casey also said there would be a minimum of $30 million in the budget for water issues.

Another major area of legislative attention this year is health care. According to Casey the uninsured population increases the cost of health care for the rest of us. An average family of 3 pays about $1000 a year in additional premiums just to cover the cost of medical care provided to the uninsured. The legislature is considering two initiatives: safety net clinics and a website which would allow consumers to shop for health care plans on a more competitive basis.

As part of the safety net clinics, incentives would be provided to communities that provide preventative health care to individuals who can’t afford it. I am not sure what this means, but be on the lookout for prohibitions and restrictions on suing safety net clinics and their doctors in the event they kill you!

As for the web based marketplace, I am not sure how that will work either. The concern here is that the insurance industry is allowed to offer all sorts of coverage plans, including the one that covers 100% of you medical expenses if you are bitten by a cobra while standing on your head! Read the fine print!

Casey also discussed an effort to provide coverage for catastrophic illness to the 25 and under age group who don’t like to pay for health insurance because as we all know, the young are invincible. They are also the biggest group of people that are uninsured. The catastrophic policy might cost as little as $45 a month.

On the transportation front, Casey indicates that the DOT is undergoing restructuring and modernization. But what about traffic? What about metro traffic? How about movable lanes? Most of us have seen the heavy traffic going one way in the morning and the other way in the evening. According to Casey the state of Virginia has movable lanes. So do other places! Sounds weird, but it may provide some relief. The biggest problem I see is that if Georgia continues to grow in population and cars, all the lanes in one direction may not be enough in 20 years. And that is the problem. No one is working on a solution that will deal with the long-term. Only time will tell!

Speaker Richardson’s Great Property Tax Plan is dead, but Casey says property owners, both residential and commercial, need relief from an ever increasing property tax burden. He suggests the legislature is considering a cap of 2% or 3% on annual tax increases. Also, local property tax assessments might be frozen until local jurisdictions establish a uniform assessment process. Frankly, I thought we had one.

Casey points out that the Governor has cut the state portion of property taxes by 1/4 mil.

Some consideration is also being giving to eliminating the income tax on senior citizens. Since I am close to being a senior citizen, I am all for this.

As for education, there will be austerity cuts. We did not have time to discuss what they might be.

And what about Georgia’s economic future? Casey says we will see a slowdown in Georgia’s economy. Inflation is up, credit is tight, foreclosure rates are up. But Georgia has always weathered economic downturns better than a lot of states. I hope this continues to be the case.

 
 Casey Cagle, Lt. Governor of Georgia [28:32m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (679)

Reservoirs? Questions of Quality of Life!

For those who are trying to figure out whether or not there is an answer to the water problem, you might want to read this commentary by Greg Bluestein (AP) in the Macon Telegraph Online. Greg points out that reservoirs are not the answer to the water problems, neither in the long term or the short term. Why?

Short term: They take years to build. They are also very expensive. According to the article, a new reservoir costs about $4000 per 1000 gallons. Dang!

Long term: More reservoirs = More water = More buildings = More people = Same problem 30 years down the road.

Now, this may sound a little naive, but when you think about it, the real problem here is deciding what quality of life we want to have in Georgia 30 years down the road. Think about this. Why do you like

to go to Wyoming? It is the 10th largest state in land size and the least populated state, less than 500,000 per the 2000 census. As beautiful as it is, as nice as it is to visit, why the heck aren’t there more people in Wyoming?

I am not exactly sure when it was in vogue, seems like decades ago, but I remember when you heard a lot about zero population growth as a goal because the world had too many people.

I don’t know anyone that actually wants Atlanta to get bigger. I don’t know anyone that wants more concrete for roads and parking lots in Metro Atlanta. I don’t know anyone that has any idea how to solve the traffic jams and transportation nightmare that is Atlanta.

Could the answer actually be that we decide that Georgia is big enough? Can we decide we have had enough growth, enough population? Can we choose to slow down so that the Georgia we knew and loved when we were kids (open spaces, natural streams and stuff like that) is actually preserved so that our grandchildren can enjoy it? Or will they look back and wonder how we could have been so stupid to have failed to make the hard choices and preserve the best in this state? Will they wonder why we left it to them to solve problems that could have been more easily solved by us in this day and time?

It sounds strange to contemplate a conscious decision not to grow and grow and grow. It sounds strange, but it has the ring of wisdom to it. Look at China. An industrial slum that will destroy its future, if not the world’s. It sounds like one of those things that we may regret not giving serious consideration to 30 years from now.

One thing is for sure, without any shadow of a doubt, Georgia can only hold so many people and building and roads. If you compare 1950 with today, it is not hard to imagine that in 50 more years, life in Georgia will not be anything like what it is today. That may have been an exciting thought in the past when running out of space and water and open spaces was not really a concern, but now it is a little scary to think of Metro Atlanta as being twice as big as it is today. When I think of that I see those weird cities in the science fiction movies where the city is all inside another building.

More on Water: Georgia Water Planning and Policy Center

Doug Wilson is the Exective Director of the Georgia Water Planning and Policy Center (GWPPC). If you have never heard of GWPPC, you probably aren’t alone. Formed in 1999 with the support of the Georgia General Assembly and the Georgia Research Alliance, GWPPC serves as a think-tank on water in Georgia.

Although the GWPPC is not involved in rule making, it is contracted with the Legislative Services Committee and the Georgia Department of Agriculture to advise them on the recently proposed “Water Plan.” It has also produced about 80 white papers dealing with various water issues, all of which can be found on its website.

Water is not just a Metro Atlanta issue or problem. Not only has Georgia’s population almost doubled since 1970, but its irrigated agricultural acreage has also increased by 1 million acres since 1970.

Consider this: Seminole, Early, Decatur, Miller, Baker and Mitchell Counties have between 400,000 and 500,000 irrigated acres of agricultural lands. Spring Creek in Early and Seminole County is dry.

Most of the water used in South Georgia comes from the Floridan Aquifer which extends roughly on a line from Blakely to Screven County. In the Albany area the aquifer lies very close to the surface and is recharged quickly when it rains. In Southeast Georgia the aquifer lies deeper and it takes longer for surface water run-off to recharge it. In Savannah and other coastal areas, heavy industrial use of aquifer water has caused episodes of saltwater intrusion into the aquifer, something that is to be prevented at all costs. This impacts commercial and industrial development because of restrictions on the amount of water that can be pumped from the aquifer.

As you may know, Lake Lanier is under the control of the Army Corps of Engineers and was originally built primarily for the production of hydroelectric power. Its use as a source of drinking water came much later, I guess when population growth made it a necessity to find new sources of available water.

When there is no drought, Georgia is all wet, about 50 inches of rainfall over the whole state each year. That 50 inches of rain equals 50 trillion gallons of water. Demand for all types of water consumption in the state is about 1.2 trillion gallons a year, and a lot of that, particularly in South Georgia, is satisfied from ground water. Thus, if we could just catch and hold more rainwater, we could have all the water we could possibly need without depriving people who live downstream of their need for surface water in the rivers and creeks.

We might even need a reservoir or two for South Georgia to use in times of drought when rivers and streams are low.

With the supply of available water growing low in Metro Atlanta, Governor Perdue and others have criticized the Army Corps of Engineers for releasing water from Lake Lanier, water that could be used by Atlantans. But it isn’t the mussels and fish living in the waters of South West Georgia and Florida that are to blame. This is well explained in a recent Op-Ed by Dusty Nix, writing for the Editorial Board of the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer. While the drought has brought the problem home, the real reason Atlanta is in such dire straits is poor planning and unrestrained development that everyone has known for years was going to result in this kind of shortage someday.

The truth is that Atlanta’s water consumption is at its absolute maximum and the drought has only served to emphasize this fact. If no more water were released and the drought continues, Atlanta is still going to be out of water in the not too distant future.

 
 Doug Wilson, Georgia Water Policy and Planning Center [31:06m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (662)

Water and the “State of the Region!”

If you don’t understand the water issues presently facing Atlanta, this diagram should make it crystal clear:
Metro Water Transfers
Still not clear? Let me refer you to the website for the Metropolitan North Georgia Water District (MNGWD) and their Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan (WSP). The MNGWD was created by the Georgia Legislature in 2001 to get a handle on the water issues for the 16 metro counties under its jurisdiction. The WSP was issued in September 2003. If you don’t want to read the whole plan, you will find the Executive Summary comforting.

I found a lot of encouragement from the fact that, according to the Executive Summary:

This WS Plan Outlines a balanced, long-term water management strategy for meeting future needs, while protecting water quality through 2030, and preserving water resources in all five major river basins.

If they have already planned this out through 2030, what’s to worry, this is only 2007!

A few other interesting facts:

(1) Surface water (rivers, reservoirs) account for 99% of the Metro’s water sources. Thus, groundwater (wells) is less than 1%. Page 6.

(2) The Basin Estimated Available Supply in Million Gallons Per Day
Average Annual Daily Basis

Chattahoochee 641
Etowah 133
Flint 61
Ocmulgee 98
Oconee 0
District Total 933 (See Page 7)

(3) There are 5 new reservoirs in various stages of permitting which will provide an additional 114 MGD. Page 7. (As far as I know, none of these will be online in the next 3 months, but not to worry, it’s in the plan.)

(4) All of the counties within the District maintain connections with at least one other county for either routine or emergency water sale. Page 7. (Proof that drought is good for capitalism.)

(5) Indirect potable reuse, or reclaimed water that is returned to water supply sources such as Lake Lanier and Lake Allatoona, provides the most flexibility in meeting future potable demands. Page 11. (I think this means that your toilet is going to have a direct line to your sink.)

Don’t let this list deter you from reading either the plan or the executive summary. I assure you there is a lot more there that you should know about that I have not mentioned.

If you are still concerned, then I suggest you attend the “State of the Region” program to be presented by the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) on November 8, 2007 at the Hyatt Regency. The ARC provides the staff for the MNGWD and is equally interested in water issues.

The keynote speaker will be futurist, Glen Hiemstra, who will kick off a two-year initiative to develop a vision action plan for Atlanta for the next 50 years. To get a ticket you can go to the ARC website, or call Monique Steele at 404-463-3191 or email her at msteele@atlantaregional.com.

I am confident that if Mr. Hiemstra is going kick off a 50-year vision, all the answers to your water questions will be answered November 8th. This is HUGE! HUGE, I tell you. Be There or Be Thirsty!

By the way, if you are wondering what the heck is a “futurist,” they aren’t crazy enough to suggest that they can predict the future. Rather, they just project it! My mother used to project the future: “Just wait until your father gets home!”

GEFA, Sewers, Conservation and Water!

If you haven’t heard of GEFA, you need to. It may have a lien on your toilet–or at least the sewer pipe that connects to it.

Chris Clark is Executive Director of the Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority (GEFA), a little known (to us ordinary folk, anyway) state authority that will hand out $288 million in 2007 to city and county governments in loans for infrastructure. In addition to his responsibilities with GEFA, Chris is also a member of the Water Council, and as head of GEFA, finances the Governor’s Land Conservation Program. On top of all that, GEFA houses the State Energy Office which administers the State Energy Program.

Chris and I started out discussing the rather mundane but important job of financing community infrastructure, like water and sewer. A lot of the money he dispenses comes to us from Washington in one of those don’t tax and spend programs. (I didn’t mention it to Chris, but GEFA sounds like the perfect Democratic scheme for funding things government can’t otherwise raise taxes to afford.) No offense Chris, I am all for government funding of essential government services, but I just could not resist the comparison.

The we hit the Governor’s Land Conservation Program which buys up land that is worth preserving in perpetuity to save it from development. (I did not ask Chris if this is the program that would have bought that property located next to the Governor’s last year, but the decision was made to let it go to the developers.)

And then we turned to water. Chris told me some things you might want to know, as well: (1) the current population of Georgia is around 9 million and is expected to grow to 18 million iby 2030, (2) our drought levels across the state have recently been changed to Levels 2 and 4, and (3) Lake Allatoona is apparently empty! That last one bothers me.

He indicates that at least part of the answer to the water problem is building more reservoirs to supply more water to North Georgia, meaning Atlanta. Currently it takes 14 years to plan and build a reservoir from start to finish. Chris says they want to cut this time in half. The problem with reservoirs: they are expensive. Chris estimates that it will cost billions of dollars over the next 30 years to build the water supply infrastructure that we need to deal with these problems. (I just don’t see where the money is coming from with all the tax cuts we have grown to love.)

If you wonder why Lake Allatoona is dried up, you need to listen to my interview with Neill Herring. Lake Allatoona is supplied by the Etowah River and provides a portion of the water that Atlanta needs. Alabama also gets water from the Etowah and Lake Allatoona and is threatening to sue Georgia demanding more water from this source.

When it came to the issue as to whether or not development in Atlanta will have to restricted in order to deal with this issue effectively, Chris was hesitant to jump into that pond. I don’t blame him, but the answer appears pretty clear. Atlanta has got to curb its growth or there are going to be more dried up Lake Allatoonas and Etowahs all across the state.

And remember, attacking Atlanta is political suicide, even if it is an environmental necessity. The guy that tells Atlanta to quit growing better have a club of some kind, a big one, because his days in power will be numbered, unless the rest of the folks in this state pick up a club and join him. Is there such a person who has the interest of all Georgia at heart? Do we have a leader who doesn’t owe the developers and the Chamber of Commerce and the insurance lobby their poliitcal loyalty? We sure as hell better be looking for one, because around 2030, I am expecting some armed combat!

 
 Chris Clark, Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority [29:14m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (420)

Public Hearings on Revising the Water Plan!

The Water Council is holding public hearings on the Water Plan. If you missed the first round, here is your opportunity to participate.

According to the website, all meetings begin at 6:00 p.m.

October 15th
Fort Valley State University
Pettigrew Center
1005 State University Drive
Fort Valley, GA 31030

Georgia Southern University
Neesmith Lane Building
Plant Drive
Statesboro, GA 30460

Augusta Technical College
Information Technology Center
3200 Augusta Tech Drive
Augusta, GA 30906

October 16th
Gainesville State College
Continuing Education Auditorium
Continuing Education Building
3820 Mundy Mill Road
Oakwood, GA 30566

Albany State University
Criminal Justice Building, Room 111
504 College Drive
Albany, GA 31705

October 17th
Armstrong Atlantic State University
Armstrong Center Auditorium
11935 Abercorn Street
Savannah, GA 31419-1997

Okefenokee Technical College
Miller Lecture Hall
1701 Carswell Avenue
Waycross, GA 31503

October 18th
The Forum
2 Government Plaza
Rome, GA 30162

University of Georgia – Athens
Georgia Center for Continuing Education
Masters Hall
1197 South Lumpkin Street
Athens, GA 30602-3603

October 19th
James H. Rainwater Conference Center
Valdosta-Lowndes County Conference
Center & Tourism Authority
Conference Room A
One Meeting Place
Valdosta, GA 31601

Columbus State University
Elizabeth Bradley Turner Center - Auditorium
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, GA 31907

Atlanta Technical College
Cleveland L. Dennard Building - Ballroom
1560 Metropolitan Parkway, SW
Atlanta, GA 30310

The Inside Story on the Water Plan and the History of the Water Wars!

If you don’t understand all this concern over water, you really need to listen to this interview. Neill Herring, as a veteran environmental lobbyist, was present at the creation–so to speak. Neill is a lobbyist for several Riverkeeper organizations, the Sierra Club and other groups and organizations concerned about the environment, natural resources and, of course, water.

The story is one of deception, not only of the people of Georgia, but whole states: Florida and Alabama. I am not sure I can even summarize the history well enough to do the story justice, so listen to the interview. The following is just an overview.

I am sure that most of us have heard something about the water disputes with Alabama and Florida, and the various efforts to resolve them. They have been going on since the 1970’s and never get resolved, primarily because Georgia (Atlanta) doesn’t want them resolved. Instead Georgia has probably mislead its neighbors for years, if not decades, into believing that Georgia would work in good faith to get the water disputes settled. But what Georgia really wanted was not a resolution, but delay and time. Time for Atlanta to build and grow and build and grow some more, so that whenever that day of resolution came, Atlanta would have the right to demand as much water as possible based on its current needs, not the need a decade ago.

This worked until Alabama finally woke up and is now threatening litigation in the Supreme Court of the United States where disputes between states are resolved.

The big player: Georgia Power. Half of the electricity sold by GP is in metro Atlanta. Have of all the electricity sold by The Southern Company is in Georgia. Thus, a fourth of The Southern Company’s success is due to the growth in Atlanta.

And that is the Water War with AL and FL. It is just a part of the Water War going on inside the State, but the fundamental principles are the same. Atlanta doesn’t have enough water to continue growing and for it to continue growing, it has got to get someone else’s water. Atlanta is at its limit, now, not 20 years from now. And Atlanta and the powers that be are doing everything they can to get control of more water so it can keep growing. If they get their way, streams and rivers will become mud bogs or worse.

Did you know the Flint River starts under Atlanta International Airport? The Ocmulgee starts in another part of Atlanta. I think Neill said 6 rivers supply some form of water to the Metro Water District, and yet, it is the Metro District that Neill says is left out of the Water Plan. Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle told me last week the Metro District was not left out, it was just grandfathered in. Whatever, it still seems suspicious to me. Grandfathering something in generally means you can’t control or change it and that just makes no sense if the Water Plan is intended as some comprehensive. Neill says the plan proposed by the Water Council is nothing more than an idea without funding.

And exactly who are the central players in this watery game? The politicians, of course. They get to decide what to do with the Water Plan. They get to decide what constitutional amendment to sneak by us with language that says one thing and means another.

On the side of Atlanta and the developers are House Speaker Glenn Richardson and House Majority Leader Jerry Keene. According to Neill, these politicians, and others who desire statewide office, can’t accomplish those personal goals without the support of the “Atlanta Growth Industry.” Those are the guys that want to build the buildings, that have the people, that use the plumbing, that require the water. They are the fat cats, the insiders, the power brokers, the guys that have the money to insure they get what they want.

How do the people stop the politicians from doing what is great for Atlanta and disasterous for the rest of the state? According to Neill, people are beginning to understand the significance of this battle, especially those outside the Metro Water District. People are beginning to pay attention. The key is to let your local legislator know that the quickest way to retirement politically is to pee in the water.

 
 Neill Herring, Environmental Lobbyist [28:42m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (555)

Casey Cagle on Property Tax Reform and the Water Plan

In this interview earlier today, Lt. Governor Casey Cagle provides his thoughts about the upcoming efforts in the 2008 legislature to eliminate the property tax and develop a water plan. These are important issues and you really need to listen to what he has to say.

My take on it is this: I think the Lt. Gov. has reservations about totally eliminating the property tax as a source of revenue, although I get the feeling he would consider some reform in property taxation. I think he promised me that any significant overhaul of the tax base was not going to be rammed down our throats, but I still don’t trust the Georgia House.

For more on the property tax issue, you need to visit the recent interview with Alan Essig of the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute.

As for water, Casey puts a lot more credibility in the Water Plan proposed by the Water Council/EPD than I do, even though he was quick to note that it will not have the force of a rule or regulation or law. It’s just a plan, man! I get the feeling he is in favor of more reservoirs to provide water for thirsty North Georgia and metro Atlanta, but notes they are expensive. What isn’t? He seems to be against taking water from one part of Georgia and giving it to another, which is a good thing to be against.

I am still concerned about that deadline in the law that gives the legislature only 20 legislative days to come up with an alternative plan if they don’t like the EPD one.

 
 Casey Cagle, Lt. Governor [26:46m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (450)

Interview with Tommie Williams, (R-19), Senate Majority Leader

If this interview with Tommie Williams is any indication, the next legislative session is going to be interesting, very interesting! Not only are they going to have to come up with a Water Plan (in the first 20 days), they are going to make a run at the biggest tax reform (the elimination of the property tax) this State has probably seen since Reconstruction. Add to that transportation (privately built and operated highways, I mean, toll roads and trolleys on Peachtree), reform of the state employees health care (no deductible, pay the second $500 out of your pocket), and it sounds more and more like 40 days and 40 nights.

A correction. In a post from a recent interview with Gordon Rogers (Satilla Riverkeeper), I said that in an earlier interview this summer Tommie had indicated that the legislature had appropriated $20M to developing a water plan of its on. Gordon said he was not aware of such. I straightened this out in this interview. Its $100,000, not $20M.

Tommie obviously has a lot of problems with the Water Plan proposed by the Water Council and my bet is the legislature is not going to let it go into effect. Whether they come up with their own plan (I doubt) or just change the law (so the plan does not go into effect by default), I expect they will do something. The issue is just too important.

Tommie seems to support for the idea of letting private companies finance the costs of building some major roads, in return for which, upon completion, they lease the road from the state in return for the right to collect a toll on the road. According to Tommie, this would allow more of the $1.5 billion highway pie to go to rural and south Georgia. I understand the principle, but the first thought that pops into my mind is the memory of $750 hammers.

If you think this is a novel idea, think again. Ever heard of a turnpike? Pennsylvania chartered the first in 1792. By 1800 there were 69 chartered companies building toll roads. I found a paper comparing the modern efffort at privately built roads with the old one.

I am not sure where I have been, but apparently this idea of privately built roads has been growing since the 1990’s, if not before. The trend is in full swing in other states.

I would think very few private businesses can afford to finance road construction. Whoever puts that financing together has got to have some serious cash or credit, not to mention power, and with it will come that much more money and power. I hate to even think about the possibilities for abuse and corruption.

If state government can increase revenues by not spending money to build a road and then increase them again in leasing the road once it is built, is the next step to sell existing roads to private business to bring in even more revenue? Ask Virginia!

As for the elimination of the property tax, this stands a good chance of being the most contentious issue the legislature deals with. While I am all for an overhaul of the way we assess and collect taxes, both on the state and the federal level, I do not understand this focus on property taxes. According to the Tax Foundation, in 2006 Georgia collected $75M in property taxes, 23rd in the nation. This was .4% of the total taxes collected by the State. I assume this figure does not include local property tax collections because, according to the Tax Foundation, state and local tax property tax collections in 2005 was $899 per capita, a rank of 33rd in the nation.

Since most property taxes are collected and used on a local level, many people see this effort to eliminate property taxes as an effort by the state legislature to grab power by controlling the money local governments need. Right now, if you think your property taxes are too high, that is a fairly local issue and you can go to the next meeting of the county commission and gripe your heart out. But, if property taxes are eliminated, instead of talking to a small group of politicians down at the courthouse, you will have to try to pin down the Atlanta bureaucrats and, I can assure you, you will never have the power to get anything changed. And what if your county does something the powers in the state legislature don’t like (such as electing a Democrat), will power be used and abused?

I am somewhat more cynical in viewing the reason behind the elimination of property taxes. I don’t see this as an attempt to be fair. It is essentially an effort to reduce the tax burden of the rich and place it on consumers. The rich get richer and the working man pays more and more of the tax burden. Now if you want to exempt residences of people over 65 who live on a limited income, fine with me.

Real estate, commercial and residential, uses expensive county services (fire, police, water). How on earth do you justify making the family buying bread at Walmart pay for services received by the property owner collecting $10,000 a month in rent at a strip mall? You pay for what you get. You get local services, you pay for local services, you pay your fair share of property taxes, you don’t make families pay for your free ride.

I don’t think this effort will succeed.

 
 Tommie Williams, Senate Majority Leader [28:07m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (386)

Interview with Gordon Rogers, Satilla Riverkeeper, Georgia Water Plan

If you haven’t heard of the Georgia Water Plan, listen up! This is going to be a big deal before the end of the 2008 legislative session and it could impact your future and the future of the State.

The Water Plan was released at the end of June 2007. Just after the Plan was unveiled, I interviewed Dr. Carol Couch, the head of EPD, about the plan. Of course, as a key participant in the process that developed the plan, Dr. Couch is all for it.

There is little argument but that we need a water plan. That’s the easy part. But, exactly what that plan will be and how it will allocate water is something else. The forces at work are those areas with plenty of water (most of Georgia below the fall-line) and those areas that require more and more water (Metro Atlanta mainly). This is not just about conserving water within a particular area. That is pretty much a given. The Water Wars will be fought in the struggle by the “have nots” to get access to and control of the water resources of the “haves.”

If you don’t think water is a growing problem, then you should listen to this interview with John Henry of Effingham County (near Savannah) which is limited in the amount of water it can pump daily and which cannot accommodate new industry which requires larger amounts of water. For Effingham, the lack of available water already affects its growth.

When it comes to water, there is no better person to talk to than a Riverkeeper. Gordon Rogers is head of Satilla Riverkeeper. One of the primary concerns of the Riverkeeper organizations is “interbasin piping.” Interbasin piping transfers water from one watershed basin to another one. Gordon has studied the plan and according to him the plan proposed by the Water Council does not rule out or prohibit interbasin piping. He thinks it should, and I do, too. Interbasin piping, if ever allowed, will inflame passions in this state even more than the “flag” issue. The consequences of interbasin piping range from environmental to ecological to economic.

The big surprise from Gordon was the fact that according to his interpretation of the plan the Atlanta Metro Water District is not included in the plan proposed by the Water Council. Now I thought the whole problem (or at least the biggest problem) with water in this state was Atlanta, its growth, and its growing need for more and more water. If Atlanta would stop growing, we might not even need a plan. The idea that Atlanta is not included in this supposed state-wide water plan is baffling, maybe even troubling. There must be a reason! And I am not sure it is a good one!

Another problem with this supposed plan, according to Gordon, is that it really isn’t a plan at all. It doesn’t decide or mandate or require specific things to be done. Basically, it just sets up a group of regional planning bodies who will supposedly get together and actually make a plan for their district. Gordon’s concern, and mine too, is that this plan doesn’t protect anything. The regional bodies could come up with a hodge-podge of proposals that don’t integrate well into a workable state-wide water plan.

Gordon recommends that the legislation requiring the development of this water plan be repealed and that we start over and develop a real plan. Why? Because the law that created the Water Council and requires the development of a plan. also provides that the plan proposed by the Water Council automatically takes effect unless the legislature adopts an alternative proposal within the first 20 days of the 2008 legislature.

After the EPD plan was published I had asked Sen. Tommie Williams, (R-19), Senate Majority Leader about the plan and he told me the state had allocated $20M to study the matter and allow the legislature to come up with its own plan. Gordon said he wasn’t aware of any $20M or any study in progress to develop and alterative plan. It would seem to me that if the legislature was going to develop an alternative plan to be presented in 2008, it would be well under way and people like Gordon would know about it.

It appears that the Georgia Chamber of Commerce is pushing the present plan, which means that business developers must want it. A week or so ago, Dr. Couch spoke to the , an organization created by the Georgia Chamber.

The Water Plan is serious business.

 
 Gorgon Rogers, Satilla Riverkeeper [28:28m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (404)