Tag Archive for 'tort-reform'

Hallelujah! CAPS ARE DEAD IN GEORGIA!

Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! There is Justice for the common man, in spite of our misguided, special interest controlled Republican legislature and Governor!!!!

What is all this about? CAPS are dead. Dead. Dead! DEAD! (Well, practically speaking, anyway!)

Many of you may be living in ignorance, but listen up, and you shall hear, a story as significant as that of Paul Revere, the freedom rider.

In 2005, within months of gaining a stranglehold majority on the Georgia Legislature, the Republican leadership and Governor Perdue repaid their campaign promises to the Chamber of Commerce, the doctor lobby and the insurance companies by depriving the citizens of Georgia of the right to hold negligent doctors fully responsible for the harm they cause. They did it by enacting, as the very first piece of litigation, a bill infamously referred to as “tort reform,” SB-5. That piece of legislation was rammed down the throats even of the Republicans who knew it was bad legislation, no amendments were allowed, vote up or down, and don’t ask questions.

One of those provisions said this:

In any verdict returned or judgment entered in a medical malpractice action, including an action for wrongful death, against one or more health care providers, the total amount recoverable by a claimant for noneconomic damages in such action shall be limited to an amount not to exceed $350,000.00, regardless of the number of defendant health care providers against whom the claim is asserted or the number of separate causes of action on which the claim is based. Official Code of Georgia 15-13-1 (b)

(Note: This is only a portion of the statute. There are other provisions which allow this amount to increase to just over $! million in limited cases, but not in suits where you sue just one doctor.)

So, no matter if you were a quadriplegic, unable to move anything other than your eyeballs as a result of a doctor’s negligence, those wise fools in the legislature decided that you couldn’t possibly be entitled to more than $350,000 for pain and suffering, even if you lived and suffered for 40 more years in that condition.

To add insult to injury, the bastards applied this law only to medical malpractice lawsuits. It a truck driver put you in that condition, there was no limitation.

Well, it took over 3 years but on April 30, 2008, a Superior Court Judge in Fulton County declared the limitation on non-economic damages to be unconstitutional. It was not surprising when the insurance company appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court of Georgia. The case was scheduled for argument before the Supreme Court before the end of the year, but that will never happen. Why?

A couple of days ago, the insurance company chickened out, decided they would probably lose in the Supreme Court and rather than have the statute declared unconstitutional, they settled the case with the injured person. I don’t blame the injured person for taking the settlement (which by the way is super confidential, a secret).

What does all this mean? It means:

(1) The insurance company can still tell everyone that Georgia has caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases.

(2) Lawyers know that the insurance companies are chicken and will be more likely to pursue cases without regard to the caps.

(3) Some lawyer, some where is going to get the same issue in front of another judge in the state and it will get to the Supreme Court for a final decision.

(4) The Chamber of Commerce and the insurance companies are going to focus their attention on judicial appointments and hopefully get the people they want on our Courts before the case gets there again.

(5) YOU AND EACH AND EVERYONE OF YOU NEED TO BE VIGILANT IN WHO YOU VOTE FOR IN JUDICIAL RACES, PARTICULARLY ON THE COURT OF APPEALS AND SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.

The Shame of Forsyth County, Georgia

Tom, just like most of us trusted his doctor, Dr. John Robert Stripling, III. In this case, Dr. Stripling performed laser surgery on Tom’s prostate and within a few hours Tom was having significant problems. A few days later Tom was dead. Why did he die? What do you think? He had two holes in his bowel, which allowed feces to leak into his abdomen, which caused an infection to set in, which killed Tom.

With just these facts, who or what would any rational person think is responsible for the holes in Tom’s bowel? The laser surgery! What else! Ah, but a medical malpractice case is not so easily made. Logic does not necessarily govern the rules of law as applied the the negligence of doctors. The law requires proof. And to get that proof, you have to do two things that doctors and insurance companies hate: you have to hire a lawyer and and you have to sue the doctor.

And, I might add, based on what happened in the malpractice suit filed by Tom’s widow, the people of Forsyth County hate it, as well.

What Dr. Stripling did to Tom was negligent. What the people of Forsyth County did to his widow is shameful.

All the experts agreed that if Dr. Stripling burned the holes in Tom’s bowel, he was negligent. The only thing is, Dr. Stripling took the position that something other than his laser surgery caused the holes. And to “prove” this, Dr. Stripling’s insurance company hired an expert who testified that Tom must have swallowed Advil or Ibuprofen pills, because that is the only thing that could have done it. Imagine coming up with something that stupid!

Doctors, their lawyers and insurance companies do it all the time because they believe that jurors will believe something stupid before they will rule against a doctor. Fortunately, most jurors are not that stupid, at least not unless they come from Forsyth County, Georgia.

Twelve citizen jurors of Forsyth County, sworn to be fair and impartial, believed (against all logic) that there must have been such a “magic pill.”

Those good people of Forsyth County thought it was much more important to rule in favor of the doctor. than to do their sworn duty to decide the issue based on the “preponderance” of the evidence. The sad truth is that those misguided, pathetic citizens of Forsyth County would probably never award money to an injured person or family against a doctor. That is how deep their hatred of lawyers and lawsuits and courts and justice really is. What is worse, they are basically proud of their bias and prejudice. They admitted it when they were questioned during the jury selection process.

I don’t know any of those misguided jurors (thank goodness), but if any of them claim to be Christian, they really need to read the Bible a little more closely, particularly Deuteronomy 1:17 or Exodus 23:6 or Leviticus 19:15.

In this interview, Steve Lowery, the lawyer who represented Tom’s family, tells the story much better than I can summarize it hear.

Steve’s law firm had to file the lawsuit against Dr. Stripling in Forsyth County because that is where he lives, even though his office is in the metro Atlanta area. They would have preferred to have been in some other county, but the law requires you to sue people where they live.

I do not know what disease infects the people of Forsyth County. I don’t really care. All I know is that they made a mockery of everything the courts and our system of justice stands for. They cheated justice and truth. They cheated Tom’s family as well. They cheated all of us because they put their bias and prejudice above the law and justice. Jurors have the power to ignore their oaths, but they don’t have the right to do so.

The good citizens of Forsyth County have sown injustice. Now, the question is, when and how will they reap it.

Tort Deform: Now There’s a Website!

This article in the New York Times about tobacco companies losing before the Supreme Court today led me to a new website dedicated to that atrocious, obnoxious, sinister, deceitful, un-American, pile of legislative hogwash known as tort reform. Choke, gag, vomit. But at least this website has it right: It’s Tort Deform!

I can’t say that I know much about the site other than the fact that Allie Wall, Excutive Director of Georgia Watch is a contributor on occassion, so that indicates to me that it has credibility. It does look like a good site to keep up with developments nationwide in the law, access to the courts, etc.

Comments anyone?

Interview with Jay Angoff, former Insurance Commissioner of Missouri and Attorney

Jay Angoff, former Insurance Commissioner of Missouri and Attorney, tells us once again that "tort reform" was a deception by the insurance industry that has lead to higher premiums for doctors, more profits for the insurance companies and less justice for the rest of us.

Interview with George Israel, President of the Georgia Chamber of Commerce

George Israel, President of the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, tells us about the battle between the Chamber and the NRA, why the Chamber opposed the "Credit Freeze/Identity Theft" legislation, and a little bit about the Chamber’s view of the Courts and Tort Reform. There just ain’t enough time and I hope to pick up this conversation with George in the near future.

Interview with Danny Orock, Legislative Coordinator, Georgia Watch

Danny Orock, Legislative Coordinator, Georgia Watch, discusses the "gun in your car legislation," insurance rate reform, tort reform regrets, and credit reform.

Interview with Michael Townes Watson, author of "America’s Tunnel Vision: How Insurance Companies" Propaganda is Corrupting Medicine and Law"

Michael Townes Watson, author of "America’s Tunnel Vision: How Insurance Companies" Propaganda is Corrupting Medicine and Law" describes how insurance companies have managed to sell the American public and our elected representatives lies and misinformation about "tort reform" in order to make more profits. In the process they have turned the practice of medicine the concept of fair laws on their heads.

Interview with Howard Nations

Howard Nations is an attorney from Texas. Texas, through the "mis-leadership" of George Bush and the Republicans, has passed tort reform measures that are bizarre. Listen to Howard explain how bartenders can get people drunk at the bar and bear virtually no responsibility if the drunk kills someone on the way home. After they got control of the Governor’s mansion and the legislature, the Republicans took over the courts to make sure their bad laws remained on the books. Listen and weep for a society gone greedy.

Interview with Casey Cagle, Republican Candidate for Lt. Governor

Casey Cagle, Republican Candidate for Lt. Governor, answers specific questions about tort reform, education, abortion, gay rights and other issues important in this election season.

Interview with Phil Henry

Phil is an Atlanta lawyer who successfully attacked one provision of the infamous "tort reform" legislation passed by the Republican legislature in 2005. The provision at issue in his case concerned the law of "venue" which defines where (in which county) a lawsuit must be filed. Phil explains why the Supreme Court of Georgia held this provision of the law unconstitutional.