Tag Archive for 'senate'

Saxby Chambliss: Fiscal Conservative and Bi-Partisan!?!?

This interview with Senator Chambliss is like all interviews with experienced politicians, you can ask the question, but the answer is totally his territory. Saxby is as good as they get when it comes to answering questions. After doing this for a few years, I have come to the conclusion that we need to pass a law that requires all elected officials to submit to cross-examination by an experienced trial attorney for at least 24 hours as part of qualifying to run for re-election.

For example, anyone (anyone other than a totally fervent partisan) who knows much of anything about what goes on in Washington would laugh at the idea that Saxby is a fiscal conservative, having served in Congress under the greatest deficit spender ever, George Bush, who more than doubled the national debt. And yet, Saxby unashamedly claims to be a fiscal conservative. You couldn’t get him to admit otherwise if you had a photo of him spending $750 for a hammer.

Saxby defends his Senate record and denies that he has been a “Yes” man for Bush. His position is that he supports the president unless it’s not good for Georgia. There are, of course, many that would disagree with that. I remember last year when he was supporting Bush’s “immigration reform” and amnesty until a grassroots effort convinced him that he needed to vote for what was best for Saxby.

What is amazing about Saxby (and many politicians, for that matter) is that he has no consistent philosophy of government that guides his votes. Hence, he makes fiscal conservatives angry when he votes in favor of Medicare Drug D, in favor of the farm bill and other such big expense items that garner votes from large constituencies. And yet, he will vote against healthcare for kids (SCHIP) because it is “big government.” I just don’t get it!

He is not in favor of the baleout of the auto manufacturers. He distinguishes this position from his vote in support of the Wall Street baleout. The $25 billion the car manufacturers want is a band-aid that will only last till February or so. Then what? More money? The sad thing is that we baled out the money changers, but can’t help the guys that do real work on a production line. Of course, unions are getting blame for all the sins of the industry. Everyone wants the auto makers to file bankruptcy and break the unions and their expensive contracts. I don’t know enough to say this isn’t necessary, but the shame is that this country almost rejoices in the destruction of the American dream: a good job, with good wages and good benefits. You will not see those 3 things coincide in many jobs for a long time.

And let’s not forget Iraq, the War that is and shouldn’t be. Saxby still insists on victory, a word that has no objective definition, is incapable of being accomplished, but which people that don’t have a clue (like Bush) still assure us is worth the death and maiming of more young Americans. What more can I say!

 
 Saxby Chambliss, U. S. Senator (R-GA) [31:06m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (11)

Rand Knight, Democratic Candidate, U. S. Senate - GA

When I asked Rand Knight why he was running for US Senate, his reply was he was fed up. Fed up with Saxby voting against the middle class. Fed up with exporting jobs over seas. Fed up with the government taking care of the top 1% of society while the rest of us that work every day for a living are left without health care and our kids don’t have a decent education.

What can I say? I am fed up as well, but fed up is inadequate to describe my disgust at politics in general and the Republican horde in particular. While I am glad that the 2008 presidential race stands to make history with the election of either the first woman or the first African-American, I would much prefer it if people were voting for candidates that are fed up, candidates that are more than a little mad. I want to vote for candidates that are truly, passionately fed up. When we, the people, are fed up enough to elect candidates that are fed up (and I mean really fed up), maybe we can eventually get enough of them in Washington to actually change something.

Rand sounded like he was a little mad, as well as fed up. As he points out, there is a lot to be fed up about. How about the soldiers that have had to do 2 or 3 tours in Iraq? Or maybe, its the fact that we are building colleges and roads and hospitals in Iraq, while ordinary folk in America can’t afford to take their kids to the doctor, even though they work more than one job. And let’s not forget the drug manufacturers and health insurance companies that are making billions in profit while everyone else in the healthcare morass is overcharged and underpaid. On top of that, our government gives the drug companies billions of dollars in subsidies so they can charge Americans more for their drugs than they charge other countries like Canada.

In particular, Rand is fed up with Saxby Chambliss’ whom he says is too busy doing the bidding of the major oil companies to do anything about the high gas prices at the pump. Rand points out that Saxby always supports tax breaks (corporate welfare) for these rich, multi-national corporations, while opposing the farm bill provisions that would afford some protection to our family farmers.

According to recent polls, Saxby’s approval rating is about 38%, the lowest of any other US Senator.

Rand appears to be a Southern Democrat in the mold of Richard Russell and Sam Nunn, politicians who understood the meaning of bipartisanship, and fiscal responsibility. Rand does not favor raising taxes, but neither does he favor giving tax breaks to the richest 1%. He points out that while the Bush administration is spending billions on the war in Iraq, it is neglecting the basic infrastructure of our armed forces. For example, the navy has fewer than 4oo ships today. Ten years ago it had 1200 ships and 20 years ago it had 2000 ships.

As a fiscal conservative, Rand believes in a balanced budget. One aspect of fiscal responsibility is becoming energy independent. Rand has a Ph.D. in Ecosystems Analysis and is eager to push alternative energy sources. He believes that with planning and foresight Georgia can become the biggest exporter of energy on the east coast.

As for the war in Iraq, Rand says that he talks to a lot of people coming back from the war, and that most all of them say that having troops on the ground in Iraq generates a lot of hostility toward America and increases terrorism.

Rand’s mother was a teacher, a member of the teacher’s union, and he is a supporter of organized labor.

Rand points out that on Super Tuesday more Democrats voted in Georgia than Republicans. If that happens in November, Saxby could be gone. He has been to 60 Georgia counties in the last 4 months trying to get his message out.

Only 99 more to go, Rand!

 
 Rand Knight, Democratic Candidate, Senate-GA [26:47m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (379)

Josh Lanier, Candidate for U.S. Senator from Georgia

Josh Lanier is a native of Statesboro, GA, but has spent the last few decades in Washington and the world. Born in 1952, he served the Army in Vietnam, and then worked for Herman Talmadge. He also served as a lobbyist for organizations like Cable TV and consulted with small businesses. In 1984 he became a trustee for the Presidential Yacht Trust and helped lead the restoration of the U. S. S. Sequoia. In 1998 he went green and helped start a company that specialized in water and air treatment, through which he gained international experience and business associations. In 2006 he retired and returned home to help take care of his mother. He has been writing a screenplay in his free time, but that may change in January.

Josh recently formed an explorartory committee to help him decide sometime in mid January whether or not he will join the race to become Georgia’s next U. S. Senator. You can watch his video and find out more about what he hopes to offer the people of Georgia.

Josh thinks (and I do too) that the number one problem with politics in America is money. It takes too much to get elected. It is supplied by people who expect something in return and while this influence of money is perfectly legal, it is also perfectly corrupt. Amen brother!

Okay, Josh, so how the hell are you going to get elected? Well, maybe he isn’t, but if he does he has made a committment to do it the right way. The right way is with a “Clean Campaign.”

This is an idea that deserves our closest attention. Most of us gripe about the money in politics. We know it is bad. It corrupts just about everything it touches in Washington. It completely supplants the power of the people who can give $100 to a candidate with the lobbyist who can funnel hundreds of thousands of dollars to a candidate with a few phone calls.

This is how Josh has pledged to run his campaign:

1. Conduct an exploratory period with “seed” donations not to exceed $100.

2. If the high exploratory period objectives are met, the Committee will “qualify” the next step by receiving 500 $5 contributions for individuals in every Congressional District in Georgia, plus 2,000 additional $5 contributions for individuals throughout the state.

3. Once “qualified” the Committee will raise additional funds for the Democratic primary election solely from individuals in amounts not to exceed $100. Under the “Clean Elections Now Act,” these primary funds would be public funds and no additional fundraising would be required.

4. The Committee will abide by strict formulas in the “Fair Elections Now Act” for spending in the primary and general elections.

The “Fair Elections Now Act” isn’t law, not yet anyway. The Act (S. 1285) is a bipartisan effort by Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) to change the way elections are funded. You can find out more about it at the Common Cause website.

So how will the candidates that reject the money compete with the Saxby Chamblisses of this country? They will have a hard time until the Fair Elections Now Act and similar state legislation becomes law. But the truth is, when states require candidates to run clean campaigns, it works. It works in Arizona. And in New Jersey. We need to get it here in Georgia.

My hat is off to Josh that is going to set the example, win, lose or draw!

 
 Josh Lanier, Candidate, U. S. Senate, Georgia [29:19m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (270)