Tag Archive for 'politics'

Now That’s a Speech!!!

In case you have not had a chance to ponder what Obama said, the text of his First Inaugural Address follows. I copied it from the MSNBC website. If my cut and paste screwed it up, I apologize.

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land — a nagging fear that America’s decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights.

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America — they will be met.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of short-cuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the faint-hearted — for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things — some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sahn.

Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions — that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.

For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of the economy calls for action, bold and swift, and we will act — not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. All this we will do.

Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions — who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short. For they have forgotten what this country has already done; what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage.

What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them— that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account — to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day — because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control — and that a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our Gross Domestic Product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on the ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart — not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience’s sake. And so to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort — even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people, and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society’s ills on the West — know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world’s resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages. We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service; a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves. And yet, at this moment — a moment that will define a generation — it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.

For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our darkest hours. It is the firefighter’s courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent’s willingness to nurture a child, that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends — honesty and hard work, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility — a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence— the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed — why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent mall, and why a man whose father less than sixty years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

So let us mark this day with remembrance, of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America’s birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

“Let it be told to the future world…that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive … that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet [it].”

America. In the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children’s children that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God’s grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America.

National Politics: Don’t Blink or You Will Miss Something!

If you tired of the two-year presidential campaigns, you may be in a daze with everything that is happening post-election. In this interview with Mark Willen, Senior Editor for Politics and Government at Kiplinger’s, Politics ’08 Blog, we cover the current state of affairs from Hillary’s potential cabinet position, to Palin’s efforts to out-do Britney Spears in media coverage, to the Chambliss-Martin battle here in Georgia, the magic number of 60, and last but not least, what happens in four years if Obama and the Democrats don’t deliver.

It’s good listening for a lazy, wet weekend, if I do say so myself.

I should point out that Mark thinks Obama should avoid a personal appearance here in Georgia on Martin’s behalf. Mark’s observation:

Obama is doing what he can to help. He’s lent his considerable organization to Martin and is bringing in more than 100 volunteers from neighboring states to help turn out the vote. He’ll probably cut some campaign ads for Martin and maybe make some video appearances.

But a trip to Georgia is another matter entirely. In the end, Obama has little to gain and everything to lose. So far, he is doing a reasonably good job of staying above the partisan fray, and he needs to keep doing that if he is to have any chance to achieve a level of bipartisanship. A campaign trip now would undercut that. He should remember what happened to Democrats under similar circumstances in 1992. President-elect Bill Clinton campaigned for Sen. Wyche Fowler in a Georgia runoff, only to ratchet up partisan resentments and have his reputation tarnished when Fowler lost.

Politics is a hard occupation. He who lives by…., dies by. As much as I would like to see Obama visit our Red State, Mark’s observation might prove true considering that, to date, there has been no announcement of any Obama trip. McCain, campaigning for Chambliss, has already come and gone.

At least everyone agrees the Chambliss/Martin run-off is going to be a matter of voter turnout.

So, there is no need to lie about voting, just GO VOTE!!!!!

“The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder” by Vincent Bugliosi

I interview a lot of people that have made the rounds on the network and cable talk shows, but Vincent Bugliosi is not one of them. The guy that prosecuted Charles Manson for murder cannot get an interview in the mainstream media about his new book “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.” Boycotted, blackballed, whatever it is, what he has to say, the powers that be do not want to hear it.

Why? According to Bugliosi: FEAR! Fear of the “Right.” It is this fear, that has protected Bush from impeachment by Democrats since 2006. Fear is why Nancy Pelosi declared, before the Democrats won control of Congress, the Democrats would not seek to impeach Bush. Maybe, after November 4th we, as a nation, can cast off fear and focus a little more on hope and justice. It is precisely this atmosphere of fear that will be the eternal and despicable legacy of the Republican Right scrawled across the face of the American Constitution. A free people living in the greatest democracy the world has ever known, live with more fear than a paranoid schizophrenic on LSD! Who would have thought it possible?

Bugliosi lays out an open and shut case that Bush knowingly lied to Congress and the American people when he and his cronies suckered us into the Iraq War. (Of course, some of you out there won’t believe this is true.) Months before Bush’s intelligence source, the CIA, told him Iraq (Saddam) did not represent any immediate threat. Weeks before the war began, Bush was asking how he could provoke Iraq into starting the war. But the worst thing George Bush did was to release an intelligence report supporting his claim for war, after he deleted the report’s conclusion that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction and was not a threat to anyone, other than the Iraqi people.

But that is not the whole story. Believe it or not, this story will live or die come November 4, 2008: Election Day! Do you know about candidate for Attorney General in Vermont? Charlotte Dennett has made a campaign promise: If she is elected Attorney General of Vermont, she will appoint Vincent Bugliosi a Special Prosecutor to indict, try and convict George W. Bush for murder.

Sounds like a plan to me.

As Vincent says and I believe: No one, including the President of the United States, is above the law.

Court TV will make millions, no billions!!!!

Of CorsI Wrote “Obama Nation”

Jerome Corsi made the rounds on all the talk shows promoting his new book, “The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.” Corsi seems to have a particular interest in people that run for president. You may remember him. In the last presidential election he wrote “Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry.” He is still proud of that one. I didn’t like the attack on Kerry, so I decided to see if I could find out if this was just another smear campaign or was there something sinister about Obama that I needed to know.

Corsi is currently a reporter with World Net Daily, a conservative so-called, news website.

I asked Corsi what he wanted everyone to know about Obama. His reply was surprisingly mundane. The two things we got around to discussing were that Obama was liberal (actually, Corsi says “leftist liberal) and he was going to raise taxes on 90% of Americans.

Corsi’s book has resulted in anti-Corsi websites and publications which contend that many of his allegations are false. Corsi essentially admitted that there were some errors in his book, but said the attacks focused on minor discrepancies, and not the major contentions. It seems obvious in talking with him that he loves the controversy; it sells books, gets him interviews and makes him rich. Can’t say I blame him, but neither can I say this guy is a serious historian.

I don’t know about the errors, but I didn’t consider it a revelation to find Obama being accused of being a liberal or a leftist liberal, or that he might raise taxes (but, I don’t think it will be on 90% of working Americans). Hell, I am one of the most conservative people I know (used to be a Republican) when it comes to waste and efficiency in government, but I am also a liberal, a damn big liberal when it comes to me versus corporate America. People should win that struggle, not corporate America. The problem in this country is we like simple name tags for complex issues.

As for raising taxes, Americans may never admit it, but somebody better raise somebody’s damn taxes. Bush tax cuts haven’t kept the economy out of the toilet and this administration has made deficit spending a thing to be proud of. Either we pay more in taxes or our kids and grandkids do. We are the ones who allowed this, and I think this generation ought to pay the bill, not my kids.

Of course, that kind of talk is heresy. All Corsi has to do is say “Obama is going to raise taxes!” and half the brains (actually, a little more than half) in this country go dark, no further thought, just total blind acceptance that this must be true and must be bad.

I am reading Corsi’t book, but have not finished it. I try to be read books that I am probably not going to like to see if there is anything in them that I consider valid or worthwhile. So far, I think this one is not worth my time, but that is probably due to the fact that I am suspicious of Corsi’s purpose. Sorry, Jerome, but the purpose of the book is not to make anyone stop and think, just to stop thinking. The sad thing is that many Americans, too many, prefer the latter to the former.

But Corsi says he is no Republican. He is a supporter of the Constitution Party which is nothing more than the right wingingest of Republicans manipulating the constitution without a clue as to what it means to anyone but themselves. But, that is another interview.

The Political Analysis You Have Been Waiting For: GriftDrift on Palin!

As you can see, I have just been too, too busy lately and have not posted a lot of recent interviews. Don’t worry, they are coming, but a guy has to make a living. Nonetheless, when James Williams (GriftDrift) is the guest, I just have to make that extra effort.

After almost two weeks of political conventions, there is enough to talk about, but after Palin’s unveiling, there is only one thing to chew on: the pitbull with lipstick. James does a much better job of putting all of this into the proper perspective than those pin-heads on the networks.

You will have to listen to this one if you want to appreciate real political analysis, but here are a few highlights:

First, is there a time warp at the RNC? They seem to be blaming everything from energy/oil, the economy, deficit spending and bigger government on the people in power–as if it ain’t been them for 7 years! Reality check, please!

And everytime these people said they respected Hillary and thought Obama was a great guy, I wanted to gag. I never cease to be amazed at the depth of their insincerity.

Does Obama have the experience to be President? Yep! Does Palin? The jury is still out.

Is McCain brillant is choosing Palin? Only time will tell, but it is a risky move by the Maverick. I don’t think women are fooled by the choice into thinking that any woman in any position in the White House, even a right-wing Republican, is better than none.

What is off limits? Pregnant daughter? Working woman? Neglecting family responsibilities? A child with disabilities? (But, can you hear the right-wing outrage if a Democratic mother chose work over family? I thought that was the breakdown of the family all those people thought had ruined America. FLIP-FLOP!)

And fair game: experience to step into the shoes of the oldest guy to be elected president.

Yes, Palin hit it out of the park. I would vote for her in a minute for “National Reader.” She could read everyone’s speech, including McCain’s when he has to go to bed early. She could read bills in the Senate. Maybe even have a regular podcast and read the newspaper to the nation. Yes, she can certainly read a prepared speech which she did not write.

But, as James points out, Palin has yet to be vetted. There are only 2 months for Americans to get to know her. Two months for her to explain that she did support the Bridge to Nowhere, even though she denied it in her speech. It is going to be two intense months for Sarah Palin.

I don’t oppose Sarah Palin because of who or what she is as an individual. I oppose her because of the misguided policies of a party that talks about smaller government and has spent us into more debt and larger government that any prior administration. I oppose her because she has no intention of building bi-partisanship–she’s a pit bull and pit bulls don’t do that! I oppose her because she is part of a party that lies and decieves us without shame or apology when the lie is exposed.

There was a time when i thought John McCain was a different kind of politician. His conduct during this campaign has proven to me that he will do anything, pander to any group, say anything and choose an inexperienced person for VP if it pleases “the base,” whatever it takes to be elected. If elected, the only thing McCain is going to change is absolutely nothing!

The Toombs County Political Forum

On June 26, 2008 What Is Goin’ On? ventured into unchartered waters with its first political forum highlighting candidates for Chairman and District representatives of the Toombs County Board of Commissioners. It was broadcast live over WLYU FM, 100.9 and was video-taped by our local TV Channel 46.

I called it a forum because it was somewhere between a debate and an interview. Just where between, you will have to decide.

There were 3 candidates for district seats and 5 candidates for chairman. The district candidates were interviewed first and then the candidates for chairman. It lasted about an hour and forty-five minutes, including 3 commercial breaks which have been deleted from this podcast.

I thought it went rather well, particularly for our first effort. The candidates were talkative and engaged in a lively discussion of a wide range of topics from waste management to non-partisan county elections.

If you are from Toombs County and have not heard the forum, you should listen and hopefully learn something that will help you decide whom to vote for July 15, 2008.

If you are not from Toombs County, it still might be interesting listening to find out what concerns the candidates of rural Georgia.

PS: It was a bear to get this recording from the radio station to the web. It is huge and required separation and re-constitution. I have not listened to the entire thing in its final format. Should you detect a gap or anything else amiss, please do not hesitate to drop me a note. Maybe I can fix it. Maybe not.

Preachers, Religion, Politics and Hispanics

Rev. Samuel Rodriguez is one of those preachers that understands what it means to be a Christian in a political world. I watched his interview on Bill Moyers Journal and knew this was someone who had come to terms with the concept of the separation of church and state. As President of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, Rev. Rodriguez helps serve 16 million Hispanic born-again Christians.

I have no patience for most politically active preachers, at least the ones with regard to which I am most familiar, those of the religious right, the ones with big mouths, small minds and million dollar homes, who tend to have agendas that are anything but Christian. And yet, thousands of thinkless sheep follow them down the path to destruction, destruction of American institutions and destruction of true religion. Such leaders are willing to pervert our political institutions, our courts, our legislatures, in order to motivate their flocks to keep giving them money, money, money. But enough about them!

I was curious about Rev. Rodriguez after I saw the Moyers’ interview, primarily because he obviously recognizes the growing political power of Hispanic Americans. And yet, listening to him it was apparent that his message is significantly different than that of the religious right. For one, he believes in the separation of church and state, not the attempted manipulation of the state by religion, such as we have seen in the last 8 years. He seems to understand that if religious faith motivates political activity, it does so within the confines of political discussion in a free country, not as a religious discussion where God supports one side and the other is going to hell.

I also wanted to know what Rev. Rodriguez thought about immigration and illegal aliens. He believes we need to stop secure our borders and stop the flow of illegal aliens. At the same time he believes that we need to find a solution to deal with the illegals who have been in America for years. I realize that many people, including me, want all the illegals to leave the country and enter legally, but, my point is that Rev. Rodriguez’ position is, in the very least, just might provide a basis for resolution of a difficult issue.

What I like and appreciate about Rev. Rodriguez is that his Christianity encompasses much more than abortion, gay rights, etc. He believes that fighting poverty, taking care of the environment, decent wages, affordable health care and all sorts of similar things should be on any Christian’s political agenda. A discussion with Rev. Rodriguez is like a breath of fresh air compared to the bigoted, braggadocio of the kind of preachers that support John McCain.

Even more importantly, although I cannot put it into words in this short post, he makes you understand, almost intuitively, that a Christian can be involved in the political process without demanding that the separation of church and state be abolished. If there is any hope for America, religiously and spiritually, it lies with men like Rev. Rodriguez, not the Hagees and Parsleys and similar Pharisees.

Casey Cagle on The 2008 Session!

It is almost the end of the 2008 legislative session. This interview with Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle touches upon the variety of content the legislature sampled in this election year. For example:

The demise of the Speaker’s Great Tax Plan.
The proposal to spur the economy with a 10% income tax cut.
The austerity cuts in the 2009 budget.
The Water Wars, Lake Lanier and The Corps of Engineers.
Efforts to develop alternative energy sources.

and of course,

The efforts to retake Georgia from Tennessee.

Pye and The Second Amendment!

Anyone that knows Jason Pye knows he is a strong believer in the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms. Jason has been blogging about a case pending before the Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Heller. Jason even recorded the oral argument and put it on his website! Just go to his home page and scroll down to “More on Heller.”

Jason hasn’t been to law school yet (He should go, I mean he really needs to go!), but he can best many lawyers when quoting cases and explaining decisions. Me? I hated constitutional law, not because it isn’t beautiful and majestic, but because trying to figure out what the law was in any particular area was akin to hearding cats. And, I don’t heard cats well–no patience!

According to Jason, the Heller case focuses the gun sights on a central question, which apparently has never been definitively answered by the Supreme Court: Is the right to bear arms an individual right? If you had asked me, I would have thought the issue was decided years ago, but apparently not.

In Heller the laws under attack are the District of Columbia’s ban on all hand guns and restrictions which require that other guns, like shotguns, be disassembled and unloaded. The argument is that the DC law effectively bans all guns, since the only guns you can have, you can’t use. It is hard to believe there is any place in America where you can’t have a gun ready and available in your home to protect yourself, your family and your property.

The odd thing is that Cheney and 200+ Senators and Congressmen signed on to a brief filed with the Supreme Court asking the Court to hold that the right to bear arms is an individual right. The problem: The Bush Administration filed a brief opposing such a broad interpretation of the Second Amendment because of concern that such a ruling might result in federal gun control legislation being declared unconstitutional. Cheney v Bush? For a better understanding you really need to read Jason’s post on JasonPye.com.

The quandry? The now conservative Supreme Court that loves to uphold the power of the government to do just about anything (like tap our phones) has to choose between its love of federal power and its love of guns, or should I say conservatives’ love of guns. I predict the guns win, the law is declared unconstitutional and the Supreme Court does some fancy dancing to preserve both guns and power. When you are the Supreme Court you can have the best of both worlds!

We covered a little Georgia politics, as well. Jason thinks Speaker Richardson’s Great Tax Plan was all about him, the Speaker that is. Cagle proposed a 10% cut in income taxes. Must be running for something! In a recession, who are these guys kidding? The voters, of course. Governor Perdue opposes both proposals since now that he won’t be running for re-election, he sees recession and decreases in revenues.

The budgets (supplemental and 2008-09) have passed both the House and Senate. Jason says there might be a showdown with the Governor over the budgets before the legislature adjourns.

The interesting part? I asked Jason to grade Cagle and Richardson’s performance this year. The results: Cagle: B- Richardson: F.

Personally, I give Jason an A for citizenship.

Insurance Reform and Agritourism: One Step Forward, Two Back

I am happy to report that the Georgia Legislature appears to be headed toward doing something that actually benefits the citizens of Georgia. What is it? A necessary reform in the law that will help make sure that when citizens pay for insurance coverage, they get the benefit of what they pay for.

In this interview Bill Clark of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association (GTLA) explains the change in the UM (uninsured motorists) coverage which will become law if SB 276 is enacted. It passed the Senate last year, but got stuck in the House. This year it looks like it may actually make it to the Governor’s desk and hopefully he will sign it.

EVERYONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND UNINSURED MOTORISTS COVERAGE! UM coverage pays you for damage to you vehicle and injuries to your body (and the bodies of other passengers) if you are involved in an accident with another vehicle that is uninsured or that is underinsured. It is dirt cheap. A lot of people elect not to purchase UM coverage because the law does not require you to have it. But it is a mistake not to have it. If you don’t know what your policy provides, you need to check it and if you don’t have UM coverage, you owe it to yourself and your passengers to get it. It is that simple.

Under the current state of the law, if you purchased $100,000 of UM coverage and you were hit by a vehicle that had a $100,000 of liability insurance, the law prohibited you from getting any benefit from your UM coverage (even though you paid for it) because your UM insurance company got credit for the liabillity coverage of the driver that hit you. It makes no sense, but that is the way the law evolved.

Just be thankful that if this law gets signed by the Governor, if you pay for $100,000 in UM coverage, you will get the benefit of that $100,000 in UM coverage. And remember, GTLA, the trial lawyers of Georgia (of which I am proud to be a member), fought to get this changed.

And when it comes to “agritourism”, GTLA is fighting the insane idea that “agritourism” businesses should not be held responsible for their negligence. Thus, if you want to hunt or fish on someone’s property, and they cause you an injury, you can’t sue them for your injuries unless they were grossly negligent (meaning they just about intended to harm you). However, if exactly the same thing occurred in some other business (Walmart), you could hold them responsible for simply being negligent, failing to exercise ordinary care.

On top of that, the Senate bill, SB 449, is entitled “Landowners Protection Act of 2008.” What does it protect landowners from? Responsibility! This is the kind of irresponsible legislation that is maneuvered through the legislature by some lobbyist paid for by some group, some business interest, that wants special treatment. It is the kind of legislation that moral leadership should oppose.

Here is the entire text of the statute:

(a) A landowner who allows a person who is 16 years of age or older to hunt or fish on the owner´s property shall be immune from civil liability for any acts done by such person on such property, provided that the landowner´s conduct does not constitute gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct.
(b) A landowner who allows a person who is 16 years of age or older to enter the owner´s property for purposes related to agritourism, as such term is defined in subparagraph (p)(7)(B) of Code Section 48-5-7.4, shall be immune from civil liability for any acts or omissions of the landowner that do not constitute gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct.”

Note that it excludes people under 16 years of age. GTLA was instrumental in pointing out that businesses ought not to be encouraged to injury minors needlessly. While I appreciate GTLA’s effort in protecting minors, I cannot help but point out that it makes no sense to encourage hurting people older than 15. Such is the strained wisdom of the Georgia legislature.

SB 449 has passed the Senate and is awaiting action in the House. It’s primary sponsors are Senators Bill Heath (R-31), Joseph Carter (R-13), Ross Tolleson (R-20) and George Hooks (D-14).

A similar bill was introduced in the House, HB 584, and is sponsored by Calvin Hill (R-21). At least it is going nowhere.

So there you have it. On the one hand, our legislature reforms the UM law to make sure consumers get what they pay for. On the other hand, they are considering excusing agritourism businesses for their negligence. One step forward, two steps back.

Someone needs to call their legislators.