Tag Archive for 'Iraq-War'

Bobby Saxon, Democratic Congressional Candidate, 10th GA

This is my second interview with Bobby Saxon. It was the day after the 5th anniversary of invasion of Iraq and I still find it hard to believe that this country has been involved in this mistake of arrogance that damn long. I might not be as perturbed if I hadn’t seen the video clips of Bush telling us it is still going great and victory is just down the road. Yeah, and the economy isn’t in a recession and gas will never reach $4 a gallon.

Thank Goodness, there are only 305 days left of him and then he is consigned to the cesspool of the worst American President. I just hope I live long enough for history to actually judge him.

But, back to Bobby. As a veteran, Bobby’s understanding of our situation in Iraq is truly refreshing. He appreciates the need to leave Iraq, to do so as quickly as possible, but in a way that does not endanger the troops. He also thinks the troops probably reflect the same divisions and sentiments as the American public. I don’t believe in blind loyalty out of uniform, but I respect the loyalty of the troops because they (and their families) may be the only Americans that have earned the right and paid the price to have an opinion.

However, the issue on everyone’s mind recently is the economy. Who would have thought that Bear Sterns would be history in March 2008? Believe it or not, it still has a website.

If you are interested in who is elected to Congress from the 10th, listen to the interview and visit Bobby’s website.

 
 Bobby Saxon, Democratic Congressional Candidate, 10th Dist. [28:33m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (232)

John Barrow (Democrat - GA 12th) on SCHIP and HOPE Tax Credit

Yesterday the Republicans once again failed to put Americans ahead of their misguided loyalty to Republican unity (whatever that means!). And for the life of me, I cannot imagine how anyone can say the Democrats have failed again to stand up to this President. When it takes a 2/3 majority to override a veto and you only have a bare majority, failure is not the fault of the Democratic Party.

In this interview John Barrow gives his perspective on why the SCHIP funding is needed. You might want to compare his interview with the one a few weeks ago with Nathan Deal (Republican GA 9th).

My problem is I do not trust the Republicans to tell me the truth about this. For example, Deal and the Republicans generally talk about this bill as “expanding” coverage and being socialized medicine. Well, it’s the same damn program we have had for 10 years and no one tried to repeal it because it was socialized medicine. We apparently have had socialized medicine for 10 years without complaint.

According to Barrow, the bill that was vetoed by Bush actually tried to correct some of the excesses that had occurred. Those excesses are providing coverage to adults, providing coverage to families with incomes in excess of 400% of the poverty level. Well, what I did not know until this interview is that all of those deviations from the original guidelines are approved and authorized by the President. Thus, when the Republicans complain about coverage being afforded to adults in New Jersey, Bush approved it. Whatever variance there is, Bush apparently approved it.

How is it expanding anything when there are hundreds of thousands of children who qualify for SCHIP but there simply are not enough funds available? The additional $35 billion over 5 years is intended to simply include more children on essentially the same basis as before. As Nancy Pelosi pointed out, 40 days of funding for the fiasco in Iraq would pay for this program. If we can’t afford SCHIP funding, we certainly can’t afford the War.

The HOPE Tax Credit has nothing to do with the HOPE Scholarship. The tax credit allows a dollar for dollar tax credit (write off) of the cost of college tuition and certain expenses. Originally, the maximum credit was $1,500 per year for a maximum of two years, but apparently it has increased over the years to $1,650 in 2006. That adds up to a tax credit totaling $3,000. John has introduced a bill to increase this tax credit to $3,000 per year for 4 years which would allow a total credit of $12,000, an increase of $9,000.

The average student loan for a college graduate is about $16,000. With the benefit of a $12,000 tax credit, the ulitmate burden of the loan is lessened substantially. The idea behind the increase in the credit is to give people a break if they are willing to invest in their education and thus the future of America. Sounds like a good idea to me.

 
 John Barrow, Congressman GA 12th [29:12m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (144)

Kevin Sites - In the Hot Zone! War in Our Time

Have you been to war? Ever get anywhere near a real war? I have not, and frankly, I don’t want to, but if called, I hope I would do my duty. Kevin Sites has been to war, several of them, and together with his new employer, Yahoo News, he brings us a world-wide view of conflict in our time. Conflict, but not all armed, at least not right now. Conflict that leaves its mark on a nation, a society, a culture, a world for generations. Conflicts like Vietnam whose memory is still with us, but whose lessons we apparently did not learn as a nation.

Kevin, a veteran war correspondent with stints at CNN, NBC and others, is now Yahoo News’ first correspondent. You may remember his coverage of the Marine shooting a civilian in a Fallujah Mosque in 2004. He was with NBC at the time and the network self-censored the graphic video and it still created controversy. The issue: Is it treason to show America the atrocities of war when it is American troops committing them?

His first assignment with Yahoo was to cover every armed conflict in the world during the course of a year, focusing not just on the fighting, but on the story that is always next door in war, the collateral damage to people, society, and cultures. On top of that Kevin was essentially a one man crew, camera (Sony HDR-HC1), sound, beast of burden and everything else.

The results: a book “In the Hot Zone: One Man, One Year, Twenty Wars” and a film documentary. You get a copy of the DVD with the book or you can see it chapter by chapter at the website.

It was Robert E. Lee who said: “It is well that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it.” I do not think even Lee could have envisioned the atrocities that wars of genocide and culture have imposed on humanity. In Lee’s day, atrocities occurred, but were certainly undesired aberrations. However, in the Congo the rape of women has become an instrument of war.

It is hard to believe that 60 years after WWII there are more than 20 ongoing armed conficts in the world today. They are not world-wide in venue, but the ripple effects have the potential to affect us all.

What is even harder to believe is that after more than 4 years of a mismanaged debacle in Iraq, we have a president that speaks of taking up arms against Iran and of a coming WWIII as if the decision to turn to war was just another thing to decide. War is not a decision you choose from a list of alternatives. War is the choice of last resort!

Even a 24% approval rating is too high.

 
 Kevin Sites, Yahoo News, Author [31:21m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (147)

Meet Bill Gillespie, Iraq Vet and Candidate for Congress (1st-GA)

One thing the Iraq war is accomplishing, in addition to giving us all something to have an opinion about, is, it seems, more and more veterans are getting involved in politics. Bill Gillespie served his country in the Army for 23 years, but the Iraq War and the policies of the Bush Administration gave him pause to consider whether or not he needed to serve in another way. He’s running for Congress in Georgia’s 1st Congressional District which has been Republican since Jack Kingston’s election in 1994.

It is early in the campaign and there are still a lot of issues and positions for Bill to fully develop, but as he notes, he’s represented America in uniform all over the world and has a pretty good foundation for understanding our foreign policy and how we are perceived as a country and as a people. Whether it is the Iraq War, immigration or healthcar, Bill believes that it is time for good, honest men, who will tell us the truth, to step forward and serve.

By the way, you remember 1994 don’t you! That was the year Newt Gingrich first fooled America with his Contract with America. That’s the year Jack Kingston got elected promoting term limits, and now his term has been 14 years. In fact, I probably voted for Jack, since I believe Toombs County was in his district at that time. (Could be wrong!)

What happened to the Contract that was supposed to change things?

Turns out it wasn’t a contract with America, but a contract with Jack Abramoff, Halliburton, and lobbyists in general.

Do you remember that contract? Well, if you were Republican then (like I was), you need to go back and read it and realize how utterly stupid we were to believe that things were going to change.

Here’s what the contract promised:

FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress;
SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;
THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;
FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs;
FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;
SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public;
SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;
EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.

Now, they may have passed this crap in the House, but as far as I know, that is about as far as it went. I do know that nothing in that list solved any problem, because all of them still exist. I dare say there was not one substantive change in American government as a result of the Contract, only a change in who sold us the goods.

I do know that as a Republican in 1994, I bit, hook, line and sinker, for Newt’s Contract with America. Over the next 6 years I enjoyed the wars of conservatives versus liberals. I trusted the Jack Kingstons of the Congress to bring true morality to government, not just radical, partisan morality that suited their base. I even voted for Bush in 2000, not yet realizing the depths to which the Republicans could sink when they controlled both houses of Congress and the Presidency.

We need a new breed of politician. We don’t need representatives in Congress that are unwilling to oppose their own party and offer “rubber-stamp” support, no matter what the issue. We need politicians that can get above the partisan debate and actually solve something. We need politicians that don’t really want to get re-elected. We need politicians who will do what is right, even if we don’t like it every now and then.

2008 is going to be a landmark election year. Don’t miss it. Get involved. VOTE!!

 
 Bill Gillespie, Democratic Candidate, 1st GA [28:33m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (150)

Fred’s Man in Georgia!

Sen. Chip Rogers (R-21) has just accepted the position as Executive Director of presidential hopeful, Fred Thompson’s Georgia campaign. In this interveiw I try to get Chip to tell us Georgians why Fred is the man.

We cover the issues from the Iraq War (which Chip still likes to call that War on Terror!), to yesterdays defeat of the Democrat’s effort to do something to bring the troops home for a rest, to immigration, to health care and then throw in a few Georgia topics as well.

Red state, red state, red state. I don’t want to give up the fight for the Democrats in ‘08, but Fred is going to be tough to beat in this state–unless he makes a mistake, maybe a big one at that.

At least Chip and I both hope that Fred’s entry into the race will diffuse some of the divisive issues that have monopolized state and federal politics too much since the 2000 race. You know the ones: abortion, gay rights, religion and the like, all issues which this country needs to solve in some manner, once and for all.

 
 Senator Chip Rogers (R-21) [27:54m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (159)

The Merchant of Death! Illegal Arms and the Iraq War

When I talk to someone like Stephen Braun, National Correspondent for the L.A. Times, I realize how far removed I am in South Georgia from the realities of a world I know nothing about and can scarce contemplate its existence: illegal arms trading. Guys like Viktor Bout, the Merchant of Death, just don’t do much business at our local Lowes. I even understand Bout was the inspiration for Nicholas Cage’s character in Lord of War

Former Russian GRU or KGB agent turned international arms trader, owner of a fleet of planes, boss to hundreds of employees, and protected by the Russian government, Viktor Bout, is the Sam Walton of arms deals. According to Braun, Viktor didn’t just sell arms to the Taliban and African dictators, after his fleet of planes delivered the goods, they were loaded with whatever products were available for transport to make the return trip profitable as well.

This guy has been banned from international travel by the UN, and yet, that doesn’t stop him from his base of operations somewhere in Russia. Within a maze of corporate names and documentary subterfuge, Viktor has even done business with the US in Iraq, being paid $60M to fly supplies.

Even though he has most certainly provided arms to Al Qaeda, the Taliban and other bad, bad people, he apparently has value to the US in Iraq. The US is supposedly working to keep him off the list of mercenaries whose assets are frozen for supplying arms to Liberian dictator, Charles Taylor. Bout has served so many governments and conflicting interests that apparently there is always someone wanting to protect him.

It just bothers me that we pay people like this to do things for us. I just can’t appreciate this fake morality of the Bush administration that condemns people for wanting to dispense condoms, but has no problem paying killers that want to dispense people. It makes me wonder if Viktor has stock in Halliburton.

 
 Stephen Braun, Author [27:04m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (157)

Erickson on the War: An Endeavor We Needed to Take!

I always enjoy talking with Erick Erickson, even though we differ on some, maybe many, things. I think one reason is that Erick is not a right-winger, but more of a libertarian-a virtual Democrat!

More importantly, Erick does disagree with his party on certain issues and policies. I think all Americans, specifically our elected politicians, should disagree with their party on something. Had such independence of thought existed in Washington for the first 6 years of the Bush presidency, we probably wouldn’t be in Iraq today and Congress wouldn’t have an approval rating in the twenties!

However, when it comes to the War in Iraq, I just don’t understand how someone as smart as Erick still supports a failed policy, much less believes it was a good idea in the beginning. We knew, Cheney knew, Bush’s father knew, everyone knew in the first Iraq War not to go to Baghdad. Nothing changed that justified jumping into that tar pit in 2003. Face it, we have made a mess in Iraq. You can say the surge succeeded, but who cares? This isn’t about a 6 month effort! This is about year after year in Iraq. Decades in Iraq. Life after America life. Bush won’t leave because he is incapable of admitting he was wrong–from the beginning. As for me, I am not willing to pay the cost of Bush’s ignorance and Cheney’s conniving another single day.

The outcome is always going to be the same: When we leave, hell will break loose in Iraq. The factions in Iraq want civil war or they don’t. All we did by eliminating Saddam, was make it possible, indeed imperative, that the people of Iraq (the good, bad and ugly tribal powers and religious factions) make a decision as to whether or not they want to build a country or destroy themselves. They might as well make that decision tomorrow. Postponing that decision is not worth one more American life. Warning: When all this proves to be true, I will say “I told you so!”

Erick also comments on Fred Thompson’s candidacy. He calls Thompson a “leave me the heck alone” Republican. Fred is definitely Eric’s preference for the No. 1 job. However, according to Erick, Rudy has an advantage in that the guy ahead in the polls and in the money at this point in the campaign is historically the winner of the nomination.

Believe it or not, Erick likes Joe Biden on the Democratic side. But he still thinks Hillary will be the nominee, historically speaking, and that a Democrat will be elected.

I still support John Edwards.

On the Speaker’s property tax reform proposal, Erick isn’t particularly opposed to doing away with the property tax, he just doesn’t trust the people at the state level to handle the money fairly. He doesn’t think Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle will end up supporting the Speaker’s tax reform proposal.

And finally, Erick and I did find agreement on immigration. Build the fence and enforce the law! According to Erick, it is mainly a matter of votes, Hispanic votes. I think it is a matter of money: cheap labor.

Last but not least, we both agree that this new presidential primary schedule is simply nuts. I think America would be well served if it returned to the kind of politics where the party nominee was actually chosen at the convention, not 5 months before.

 
 Eric Erickson, Republican Strategist and Blogger [26:09m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (147)

Which of the Following Does George W. Bush Need the Most?

DEAR DIARY: Thursday, September 13, 2007 (A day that once again reminds thinking Americans how, in just a few years, Republican philosophy and power has totally screwed us over as a nation):

After having listened to George Bush make statements which suggest he has no clue what is actually going on In Iraq, I am at a loss to deal with his idiocy by any effective means. Thus, I offer the following multiple choice question to alleviate my frustration and attempt to maintain my sanity.

Which of the following does George W. Bush need the most?

1. A milk enema.
2. A psychiatric examination.
3. A kick in the ass.
4. A one-way ticket to Baghdad with full desert gear.
5. An impeachment resolution.
6. All the above.

Interview with Roger Charles, President, Soldiers for the Truth

Prepare yourself to be disgusted if you listent to this interview. Why? Because you will learn that the lives of our young men and women fighting in Iraq are not the number one priority of our military leaders, at least not when it comes to providing them with the best equipment. Soldiers for the Truth is an organization dedicated to supporting our troops by making sure they have the best in equipment, the best protection, the best chance of surviving war.

Soldiers for the Truth was founded in 1998 by Col. David H. Hackworth, deceased. Roger is a veteran who attended the Naval Academy and retired as a Lt. Col in 1990.

While most of us have heard of the controversy over providing our troops with body armor, you just will not believe it when Roger tells us that our troops don’t even have the best boots. Some special operation forces are being sent out to buy boots at REI. The rest of the troops either have to buy their own boots at their expense or take the standard government issue.

Can you believe there is a non-profit organization dedicated to buying and supplying our soldiers with helmut liners that are more effective and offer more protection than standard government issue?

Believe it or not, there are also issues as to whether or not the troops have the best rifles and pistols. Why? FOLLOW THE MONEY! It’s the people Charles calls the “Perfume Princes” in the E-Ring of the Pentagon, those who want to get a job working for someone in the military industrial complex when they retire, so they build bridges of friendship and money while they are in the military, all at the expense of the lives of our troops. (And I am supposed to believe whatever General Patreaus tells me in a few weeks about success in Iraq?)

And then there are the K-Street lobbyists who woo the boys in the Pentagon to buy this product or that product. Is there any wonder why the idea of what is the best helmut, the best boot, becomes a matter of nothing less than corruption. After all, a boot is a boot is a boot–until you are the one wearing it in 130 degree desert! And certainly body armor is all created equal–until it doesn’t stop the bullet aimed at you!

I am sure you have all seen something on TV or in the news about body armor. The question is whether the military is buying the best available for the troops. Testimony before Congress appears to be heated and conflicting.

As I understand it, the classic body armor has been ceramic material that is bulky and can’t be fashioned to be worn so as to protect certain areas of the body, like under the arms. And then there is a new body armor called Dragon Skin that may be superior. Others disagree. But what I don’t understand is how Roger Charles tells me that Soldiers for the Truth has been asking the military for more than 2 years now to agree to arrange an independent test of Dragon Skin which might, hopefully, put the controversy to rest. I mean if our level of technological advancement won’t allow us to establish whether or not one type of body armor is superior to another, we need to just find a hole and get in it.

Unless Charles is lying or stupid (I don’t think he is) it just makes no sense for anyone to oppose testing Dragon Skin or any other item of equipment to make sure we supply our troops with the best. Why isn’t this the first and foremost priority of the guys at the Pentagon, the Secretary of Defense, the Commander in Chief, the President of the United States, George W. Bush!

Charles also said that Senators Jim Webb (D-VA), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and others, support his efforts to get to the bottom of the body armor controversy.

I am also happy to say that after the interview Roger checked and told me that John Barrow, our Congressman from the 12th, was also a supporter of his organizations efforts.

 
 Roger Charles, Soldiers for the Truth [29:57m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (127)

George, George, George of the Bungle…

In honor of President Bush’s recent revelation comparing the Iraq War with Vietnam, I present this lyrical effort to be sung to the tune of George of the Jungle!

George, George
George of the Bungle,
Dumb as he can be.
(Ahhhhhhhh)
Watch out for Iraqis.

George, George,
George of the Bungle,
Lives a life that’s free.
(Ahhhhhhhh)
Watch out for Iraqis.

When he gets in a fix,
he shows us a trick
with the help of his fiend,
a dick named Dick.
Then he’ll go vacate
at his ranch till its late
While Condi and Laura
Gravitate.

Well….George, George
George of the Bungle,
Friend to Turks, Sunnis.

Watch out for Iraqis.