Tag Archive for 'global-warming'

Rep. Jeff Lewis (R-15), Chairman House Energy Committee

Jeff Lewis is Chairmen of the House Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee. While the committee has a broad range of jurisdiction, this interview focused on energy. You may have heard of the ethanol plants being built in Georgia. The one in Camilla uses corn and the one in Treutlen County uses wood chips (pine trees). According to Lewis, it takes about 1 to 1.5 gallons of energy to produce one gallon of ethanol using corn. Wood chips take less energy to produce the same gallon of ethanol.

Georgia has more pine trees than any other state in the Union. If wood chips can be utiltized to produce ethanol efficiently, such plants could represent an economic boost to the state in the future.

When it comes to generating electricity, it is anticipated that in the next 10 to 15 years Georgia will need another 22 to 25 thousand additional megawatts of electricty per day. That could mean as many as twenty new power plants. That’s a lot of power plants! You may not realize it, but new power plants are being built all the time. While the Public Service Commission has responsibility to approve the construction of a new plant, the Energy Committee has the responsibility to set the guidelines by which new plants are considered and authorized.

You will not believe the number of power plants in Georgia, and most of them are not owned by Georgia Power. Many companies and cities apparently generate some amount of electricity.

The decision that is on the horizen is whether or not to change that focus from coal or natural gas plants to nuclear plants. A nuclear plant generates 1000 to 1500 megawatts of electricity. It can take 12 to 15 years to plan, permit and build a nuclear plant. The Energy Committee could increase electricity production in Georgia by shortening the time required to permit a new plant.

I get the impression from Jeff that nuclear power is coming, it is just a matter of when. The “Three Mile Island” incident in 1979 resulted in a virtual moratorium in the construction of nuclear generating plants. According to Jeff, nuclear power is the most efficient and cost effective energy source. He believes the issue of disposing of nuclear waste is being dealt with.

While the US obtains almost 20% of its electricity from nuclear power, Europe relies heavily on nuclear energy: France 80%, Italy and Spain 60%, and England 50%. Here’s a list of European countries with nuclear power plants.

Jeff also mentioned a new generating plant to be located in Clay County, which will generate 250 megawatts by burning “biomass,” such as peanut shells and pecan hulls. The Committee approved a sales tax exemption for the plant so that it did not have to pay sales tax on the raw products it buys to generate electricity. This incentive was necessary to convince the plant to locate in Georgia, rather than Florida or Alabama who were also competing to get it.

I also asked Jeff about comments attributed to him when the Committee met in August in which he expressed doubts as to whether or not global warming is real, and if real, to what extent do humans contribute to or cause it. Jeff took a lot of heat for those comments.

Like a lot of people, I believe global warming is real and that human generated greenhouse gases contribute to it, but the truth is, my opinion means absolutely nothing.

The concern is that while other states have passed laws setting goals for energy efficiency and emission standards, Jeff and other Georgia legislators apparently don’t believe that such measures are necessary. Jeff doesn’t want to do anything to handicap the state’s economy, when its competitors around the globe may not be doing likewise. He says that he and other legislators are educating themselves so that if and when they have to make substantive decisions for or against global warming, they can make the best decision for Georgia.

I think that global warming is an issue that is too big for individual states to resolve. This issue requires and demands leadership on a national scale. Without that kind of leadership, there will only be a continued unresolved controversy. It is just like the water problem we are now dealing with in Georgia. State leaders have known this problem was approaching for years and did nothing, primarily because to do something is to limit growth or spend a lot of money. Just like water, states will never effectively deal with the economic aspects of global warming until some crisis in the air or water quality exists. Just like water, that could be too late.

Jeff indicated that the Committee is not presently expected to consider any specific legislation during the ‘08 session.

 
 Rep. Jeff Lewis, (R-15), Chairman, House Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee [30:37m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (346)

Will We Ever Have “Freedom From Oil?”

I do not understand gas and oil. Oil is almost $90 per barrel crude and about $3.10 a gallon in the car. I thought the world was supposed to end when it reached $50 per barrel. I thought I was paying $3.00+ per gallon when it was $50 per barrell. I know damn good and well it doesn’t cost any more to pump it out of the ground today than it did a couple of years ago. So how come it’s almost $100 per barrell?

But why dwell on something you can’t do anything about i.e., the current price of oil? Congress surely isn’t going to do anything about it. Never has, never will. So let’s focus on tomorrow. How do we get away from being subservient to oil? To answer that question, I wanted to interview someone who has a plan. David Sandalow is an expert on energy, a former Assistant Secretary of State and a Senior Director on the National Security Council staff. Now, he is a Senior Fellow on Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institute. His current book is “Freedom From Oil: How the Next President Can End the United States’ Oil Addiction.” David is dead serious about reducing our dependence on oil. You can read the book or visit the Freedom From Oil, but regardless, you need to get your heart, mind and soul set to live with less oil.

David is ready to do his part. He has a prototype car that he plugs in every night, charges the battery and drives up to 30 miles without ever burning a drop of gasoline. Think about the independence such a vehicle could provide to all those people who drive less than 30 miles a day to and from work. But you can’t buy David’s car, at least, not right now, but he expects it and others to be available in 3 or 4 years. Check out the Chevy Volt.

I remember the “oil crisis” during the Carter Administration and the long lines at the pump. What I really don’t understand is why, 30 years later, we are virtually no further along weaning America from its dependency on oil. Remember all those years ago when we all thought we were going to have to ride around in small cars. The next thing I know, I am buying a SUV. But, this is not my fault!

I think the problem has been a total failure of leadership, political leadership, corporate leadership, any and all kinds of leadership. Our leaders never chose a direction away from oil dependence. This is a bipartisan failure, Democrat and Republican. But, what is done is done. Blaming all or any of them is not productive and doesn’t save a drop of gas. (In fact, it may give you gas to think about it!)

David’s goal is to encourage us to chose the road out of this dilemma. He tells the story of the American General commanding the western forces in Iraq who wondered why he had to endanger the lives of his men and women delivering fuel to run electric generators. Surrounded by an abundance of wind and sun, he requested generators that could run on these alternative sources of energy. The Pentagon is working on it. You would think they would have thought of this one after 1991 or at least after they started painting all their vehicles tan for fun and sun in the wind and sun of the deserts of the Middle East.

David sees hope in solving the dependency problem because of two basic differences between today and the past. First, while this has always been tagged as a national security issue, national security has changed since 9-11. Today, it is easier to image oil producing countries like Venezuela and Iran intentionally depriving us of oil and attempting to disrupt our economy. Second, there is a lot of money to be made by companies that solve the problems associated with global warming. It is precisely because there is money to be made that we will be able to solve the problem. Making money motivates.

He mentions meeting with Newt Gingrich and Howard Dean on separate occasions and both offering the same essential solution: a massive, Manhatten type project to develop alternative fuels and alternative energy sources.

It seems the problem for consumers is the lack of available choices. Our market economy gives us thousands of choices with regard to most things we want to buy, except when it comes to cars. When it comes to cars, we basically have one choice: buy something that burns oil. He points to Brazil which has replaced about half its fuel consumption with ethanol. If Brazil can do it, why can’t we? Simple, a lack of leadership.

How long will it take to obtain this freedom from oil? David says a generation, 20 years. Why? Well, there are about 240 million cars on the road in America and we can’t afford to just scrap them. They will have to wear out. (Based on the longevity of cars, I estimate that all cars on the road today will be ready for the scrap pile by April 1, 2010, so I am not sure why it will take 18 more years.)

According to my calculations, about the time we achieve independence from oil, social security will go bust, and I will be wearing diapers. But at least David gives me hope that my grandchildren will have a greater appreciation for conservation and preservation than my generation.

 
 David Sandalow, Author, Freedom From Oil [24:45m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (310)