canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england


Levitra instead of such famous love-drug Viagra?canadarxgeneric.com

Tag Archive for 'Democrats'

Damn It! I Said Change!! I Meant Change!!!

For everyone and anyone who is griping, whining or complaining about Joe Lieberman keeping his chairmanship or dumbfounded that Hillary Clinton may be our next Secretary of State, I have only one thing to say: The proof is in the pudding.

There are a lot of things that Obama could do to prove he is going to change things. Any choice of one thing would necessarily limit or eliminate the choices of something else. Someone might not like it. The old politics was not to lead, rather not to ruffle feathers. Cut the deal, favor the friends, reward your supporters.

Obama is changing the rules. Obama is determined to change politics in this country and if he can change politics, he just might be able to change other things like the economy, or healthcare.

But, I am fine with him starting with politics, since that is the only thing he can change before he takes office on January 20, 2009. I would be fine it he locked the doors of the capital and told them to go home. I would gladly give him 60 days as supreme dictator if that is what it took to see if someone in this country could bring about change! Radical! You bet. Am I serious? I sure am. Of course, I know Obama is not going to do that. My radicalism is safe, but…..

I am smelling change. I am high on it, just like glue. I demand it. I need more of it. I will do anything to insure that we have more change.

Change has its own danger. Appointing Hillary could be a big mistake. But, I voted for Obama. I wanted him to have a mandate for change. I am going to support his decisions. My bet is that if Hillary doesn’t mind her manners, she will be replaced. And soon!!

I would like to personally grab Joe Lieberman by the nape of the neck and kick his ass down the steps of the capital, one step at a time. He is a sorry sack of crap, a weasel, a scummy little sucker of opportunities and I hope he loses when he runs for re-election in 4 years.

But, if Obama can use his sorry carcass and wants him to keep his position of leadership, then he has my blessings. He can always be discarded later when he is all used up.

Everything Obama does proves to me he is a leader. He is going to bring change whether we like it or not. We are going to change, even if we go kicking and screaming.

After all, isn’t this what we said we wanted!! Ain’t it?

Jason Pye on Spreading the Wealth!

Here’s one to listen to, Pye and me! Or is that Pye and I? It has been a while since Jason and I mixed it up, but this interview was well worth the wait. A little heat, a lot of heart and absolutely no bull.

Of course, Jason, as a Libertarian, voted for Bob Barr. Bob Barr, you know, the Libertarian Candidate for President. Bob Barr, the ex-Republican (ain’t we all!)!!! That made Jason’s choice easy, but in an effort to help all you out there that may be undecided (about what, I have no idea), I decided to ask Jason why he would not vote for McCain. One word: Iraq! Good word, simple and to the point.

Jason agrees that McCain is toast, too far behind to ever catch up. Palin is not qualified to be a V.P. nominee. Obama has a chance to take Georgia. The Democrats may reach that magic number of 60, but even if they get close, they will have 2 or 3 Republicans they can count on. Sounds depressing. Makes me wonder why Republicans would even show up to vote.

We avoided discussing the “Bradley Effect.”

We fell into the abyss when I asked why he wouldn’t vote for Obama. One word: Taxes! Jason is much too nice of a guy for me to jump on him in print, but we did get into it. Jason thinks Obama is going to “spread the wealth around,” which makes Jason very uncomfortable. If Jason were a Republican I could say that Bush has been spreading the wealth around (to Halliburton, Blackwater, etc.) pretty good himself, but that doesn’t work with a Libertarian. They don’t like Bush either!

I could say, we are in the process of spreading the debts (Wall Street’s) around, so why not the wealth, but Jason doesn’t like the baleout either.

So what does “spread the wealth” mean? I guess only time will tell, but let me tell you what I think it means. It is nothing sinister or socialistic. Hundreds of thousands of people work for hundreds of companies all across America. They are good employees. They work hard. In this day and age, they are thankful for their jobs. They can’t quit their jobs, at least, not for a better job. Let’s say they make more than minimum wage, $10 an hour or $20,000 a year. They have 2 or 3 kids and live in a rental apartment of house. After the subprime mortgage fiasco, they will never buy a house because they will never get approved for a mortgage, because they will never save the 20% downpayment. Now, as a society, we expect them to raise good kids, productive kids, educated kids. We expect them to be good parents and to spend quality time with their families so they don’t end in a divorce. They are living from pay check to paycheck. (PLEASE NOTE: I think they would be living from paycheck to paycheck if they may 2 or 3 times as much, which is what most of us do.) By the way, if this is not a fairly accurate depiction of American families (maybe even, too rosy), someone tell me, because this is what I see everyday as a lawyer.

Now this person, this family, is maxed out. Another bill, an unexpected illness, a tax increase is going to cost them a lot, maybe everything.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX PAID: I would guess no more than $1,500.00 a year.

And then there is the person that owns one of these companies. He is a good person, a good manager, comes to the office everyday and does his part to make the company successful. He lives well, his kids go to private school, he takes at least 2 weeks of vacation and flies across the country to resorts to show his wife and kids the good life. He has an IRA that he contributes to regularly. He has two houses. He is saving for college, the best college, for his kids. He invests conservatively in the stock market and every once in a while makes some money. His annual income is $500,000.00. Please note, this does not equal taxable income, which is generally lower.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX PAID: Let’s say $120,000.00.

Now, assume the government is $10 trillion in debt. (Contrary to popular disbelief, there is a rational basis for this assumption.)

Whose taxes should you raise? Whose minimum wage should be higher?

Can you solve the problem? How about it Jason? Love ya, man!

 
 Jason Pye, Libertarian and Political Commentator [31:52m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (466)

Savannah Daily News Endorses Barrow and Gillespie for Congress!

The Savannah Daily News has made its endorsements for Congress in the 1st and 12th District. Their selections:

Bill Gillespie for the 1st District.

John Barrow for the 12th District.

This is the first time SDN has not endorsed Jack Kingston. The edorsement explains why:

……It is painful to no longer endorse our friend, Jack Kingston. Many of us know Jack and his family personally and cherish their friendship and their public service. Jack Kingston is a good man, personally, but he has never had a viable or credible Democratic opponent to truly consider.

And these times force us to step back, and take a hard look at his actual voting record on critical issues including fighting all measures to set a timeline to get out of Iraq, his failure to fight runaway Federal spending as a member of the House Appropriations committee that develops the budget, his leadership in defense of Tom Delay and President Bush as well as Republican party smear campaigns this election cycle, and his failure to file his personal financial disclosure information due last May 15 even though he was up for re-election. These votes and others lead us to believe that it is time for a change in 1st District representation.

Frankly, Jack began to lose our support last Feb. 27 when he appeared on the Dan Abrams show and said it was okay to “question Sen. Barack Obama’s patriotism because he doesn’t regularly wear an American flag lapel pin.”

Problem was, sitting there on the TV set with the cameras rolling, Jack wasn’t wearing a flag pin. These types of smear tactics are repugnant and demean elected officials in an era when voters are begging for straight talk on the issues versus old-style personal attack politics.

Yet, he continues to try to use such tactics, seeking to smear his opponent Bill Gillespie in this race, accusing him of lying about his educational degrees and other achievements, despite two news organizations having confirmed that Gillespie’s resume is accurate………

And its reasons for endorsing John Barrow are:

John Barrow deserves our support for another term as the Congressman from Georgia’s 12th District.

While his voting patterns may not be liberal enough for some in the 12th District, particularly in the Savannah area, his legal mind continues to serve us well, demonstrating a pattern of pulling apart legislation and voting on the quality of a bill and its intention versus just following a straight political party line.

He voted against the bailout bill because there was “too much downside for the taxpayer. There were specific areas of fraud and abuse that were skillfully manipulated out of the final product,” he says. That approach to in-depth study is what we depend on from our elected representatives.

And we must send representatives to Congress who will take tough stands on the legislative issues ahead for the 111th congress, issues in addition to current financial crisis matters. One of those issues for the 12th Congressional District is needed reform of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation, up for renewal in the next session. Improving public schools and developing a more qualified work force are seismic issues for the district.

Barrow shares our views, believing that NCLB was a good idea that “got hijacked from how it was designed. There is nothing wrong with standards, nothing wrong with being sure that Georgia is getting the same bang for its educational buck as Texas, but the Bush administration failed from the beginning to fund the bill, which is exactly what they promised they would not do if it was enacted,” he states. “So we’re raiding the local tax base to continue to fund federally mandated educational programs.” We couldn’t make these important points any more succinctly than John’s own words.

A 2008 study from the U.S. Department of Education, in the recently released “Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report,” states that the performance of students in 12 states who were in grades one to three during the 2004-5 and 2005-6 school years and completed the Reading First Program, a major billion dollar a year NCLB effort, had proven “ineffective.” A final report on the impacts from 2004-2007 (three school years with Reading First funding) and on the relationships between changes in instructional practice and student reading comprehension is expected in late 2008. It’s an issue ahead that needs tough analysis, and tough stands to ensure funding in a time when there will be little money to spare.

His opponent, John Stone (R), represents the old school party politics of big lobbyists and insider power players. He has spoken out on few issues in this campaign with the exception of his recent one-day media event in Savannah to propose his solution to the U.S. economic crisis, including ideas that cannot be enacted, such as imposing a moratorium on home mortgage foreclosures.

Barrow has high marks and endorsements from business organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. And his position on immigration is realistic in light of the needs of Georgia and the 12th District. He supports securing the borders and enforcing the laws we have but without dramatic measures supported by many.

Most importantly, John Barrow is accessible and in the district often, spending endless weekends in its small towns, meeting face-to-face with voters, versus leaving all the constituent work to paid staffers.

John Barrow is a Blue Dog, fiscal conservative Democrat in an era when we’re all feeling pretty blue about the economy, and we need his take on the solutions

Campaign ‘08: Whose Electable? Obama and Giuliani!

Whose up and whose down? Who said the wrong word? Who has the right strategy. I can’t keep up!

Obama has Oprah, which makes the campaign the Story of Os.
Hillary (and Bill) can’t take cheap shots at Obama, which sounds sexist to me.
Edwards is the only Democrat talking like a Democrat, and can’t get the rest of Iowa to understand that we haven’t elected a sitting Senator (Obama and Hillary) since 1960.

Romney doesn’t think his Mormon faith should matter so that is all the man can talk about.

Giuliani probably can’t believe he is not currently the chosen one, considering his heroism on 5-28.

McCain gets the endorsement of The Des Moines Register and the Boston Globe, but is still apparently so desparate that he asks that Democrat/Independent, bi-polar, sorry excuse for a candidate in ‘00 Joe Lieberman to support him. I had rather be waterboarded. Actually, maybe this is waterboarding.

Huckabee has the faith of a preacher, but is betting on Ed Rollins to save his political soul.

And today, I find out that Ron Paul has raised another record $6 million in one day on the internet. That is like saying that someone other than Halliburton got a contract in Iraq. So what? However, I have to say go Ron Paul. By George, if nothing else, you may prove the power of the internet and people in time for ‘12.

It just seems to me that none of this makes sense. I am having a hard time keeping it straight. What I really think is this: The polls are wrong! I am betting the Iowa Caucus is having as much difficulty as I am. It’s an open race all the way to January 3, 2008. I think Edwards and McCain are the sleepers. I think Iowans are not telling the pollsters the truth. But hey, what do I know?

In this interview Bob Newman of Newman Communications, gives us his take on what is going on.

Bob thinks even though Obama is enjoying a lead in the polls, Clinton is going to edge out a victory in Iowa and New Hampshire. On the Republican side, Huckabee will win Iowa, not New Hampshire and South Carolina doesn’t matter because no preacher is going to be elected president.

The unfortunate candidates are McCain and Edwards, both of whom epitomize the core beliefs of their respective parties, but neither seem to be able to capitalize on the issues. McCain may be paying for his support of Bush and the War. Edwards should be the most electable but doesn’t seem to be captivating the electorate. But don’t count him out.

Georgia seemed to be Fred Thompson’s back yard a few months ago. Now, it appears that Fred is either lazy or old or both, but in any event he is out of it for all practical purposes.

Bob would like to see Obama get the nomination. It would make for an exciting election. His problem is trying to acheive broad appeal to whites and blacks. He is not talking about the typical black issues, so as to avoid being perceived as a Jesse Jackson. Clinton, on the other hand, has inherited Bill’s broad base of support among African Americans, which explains why Obama brought out the Oprah. For this reason, Bob wonders if Obama’s lead in the polls is legitimate and raises the possibilities that the Iowa electorate doesn’t want to say on the record that they aren’t voting for Obama.

All things said, the bottom line is who is the most electable? Bob says: Obama for the Democrats and Gulliani for the Republicans.

And the most important question: Is there any chance a Democrat won’t win in ‘08? Bob answers this question by saying that he thinks there is a chance that Giuliani could win.

If the Democrats can’t win in ‘08, I will just……

 
 Bob Newman, Newman Communications, Public Relations & Political Consultant [29:09m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (618)

Interview with Congressman John Barrow (D-12, GA)

Congressman John Barrow (D-12, GA), discusses the proposed immigration bill pending in the Senate, and the Farm Bill, particularly the provision that would require food imported from abroad to show the country of origin.

 
 Standard Podcast [27:25m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (567)

Interview with Jane Kidd, Chair of the Georgia Democratic Party

Jane Kidd, Chair of the Georgia Democratic Party, discusses her efforts to revamp and strengthen the DPG.

 
 Standard Podcast [30:42m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (537)

Interview with Douglas Schoen, Democratic Political Strategist and Author of "The Power of the Vote"

Douglas Schoen, Democratic Political Strategist and Author of "The Power of the Vote" discusses his life in politics, the future of the Democratic Party and the 2008 presidential campaign.

 
 Standard Podcast [27:15m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (528)

Interview with James Marlow, Democratic Candidate for Congress, 10th District - GA

James Marlow, Democratic Candidate for Congress, 10th District - GA, discusses his campaign and the upcoming election on June 19, 2007.

 
 Standard Podcast [27:15m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (427)

Interview with Terry Holley, Democratic Candidate for Congress, 10th District

Terry Holley, Democratic Candidate for Congress, 10th District, discusses his campaign to win the 10th District (Augusta, Athens and North Georgia) for the Democrats. Can he do it? The election is June 19th and its the only Congressional election going on in the US.

 
 Standard Podcast [28:02m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (534)

Interview with John Barrow, U. S. Congressman (D-Ga 12)

John Barrow, U. S. Congressman (D-Ga 12), tells us about his efforts to help veterans get easier access to medical care, as well as reasonable reimbursement for travel expense to VA facilities.

 
 Standard Podcast [29:13m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (411)