<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with James Williams, GriftDrift on Voter ID Ruling and Property Tax Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatisgoinon.com/podcast/2007/09/10/interview-with-james-williams-griftdrift-on-voter-id-ruling-and-property-tax-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatisgoinon.com/podcast/2007/09/10/interview-with-james-williams-griftdrift-on-voter-id-ruling-and-property-tax-reform/</link>
	<description>Hosted by Wilson R. Smith, Attorney at Law on 100.9 FM WLYU. Presented by TCB Broadcasting, Lyons, Ga.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisgoinon.com/podcast/2007/09/10/interview-with-james-williams-griftdrift-on-voter-id-ruling-and-property-tax-reform/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisgoinon.com/podcast/2007/09/10/interview-with-james-williams-griftdrift-on-voter-id-ruling-and-property-tax-reform/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Sara has &lt;a href="http://griftdrift.blogspot.com/2007/09/hatin-on-everyone.html#comment-126421541285880131" rel="nofollow"&gt;a good explanation&lt;/a&gt; of why the plaintiffs didn't have a potential voter who was affected:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The thing is, I think you could find a plaintiff who could meet the standing requirements, but it would be tough to convince that person to sign up as a plaintiff and be the public face of this lawsuit. I mean if a group was determined enough, they could find someone in the way rural backwoods who's living without a car, without any way to get to a local registrar, and without any form of valid ID. But how many people who fit that bill are really going to want to go through the drama and pain in the ass nature of being a plaintiff in a lawsuit?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So, that's why the "well, they couldn't parade forth someone who was prevented from voting, therefore the argument is bunk!" thing doesn't  hold water for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara has <a href="http://griftdrift.blogspot.com/2007/09/hatin-on-everyone.html#comment-126421541285880131" rel="nofollow">a good explanation</a> of why the plaintiffs didn&#8217;t have a potential voter who was affected:</p>
<blockquote><p>The thing is, I think you could find a plaintiff who could meet the standing requirements, but it would be tough to convince that person to sign up as a plaintiff and be the public face of this lawsuit. I mean if a group was determined enough, they could find someone in the way rural backwoods who&#8217;s living without a car, without any way to get to a local registrar, and without any form of valid ID. But how many people who fit that bill are really going to want to go through the drama and pain in the ass nature of being a plaintiff in a lawsuit?</p></blockquote>
<p>So, that&#8217;s why the &#8220;well, they couldn&#8217;t parade forth someone who was prevented from voting, therefore the argument is bunk!&#8221; thing doesn&#8217;t  hold water for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
