canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england


Levitra instead of such famous love-drug Viagra?canadarxgeneric.com

Monthly Archive for October, 2008

“The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder” by Vincent Bugliosi

I interview a lot of people that have made the rounds on the network and cable talk shows, but Vincent Bugliosi is not one of them. The guy that prosecuted Charles Manson for murder cannot get an interview in the mainstream media about his new book “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.” Boycotted, blackballed, whatever it is, what he has to say, the powers that be do not want to hear it.

Why? According to Bugliosi: FEAR! Fear of the “Right.” It is this fear, that has protected Bush from impeachment by Democrats since 2006. Fear is why Nancy Pelosi declared, before the Democrats won control of Congress, the Democrats would not seek to impeach Bush. Maybe, after November 4th we, as a nation, can cast off fear and focus a little more on hope and justice. It is precisely this atmosphere of fear that will be the eternal and despicable legacy of the Republican Right scrawled across the face of the American Constitution. A free people living in the greatest democracy the world has ever known, live with more fear than a paranoid schizophrenic on LSD! Who would have thought it possible?

Bugliosi lays out an open and shut case that Bush knowingly lied to Congress and the American people when he and his cronies suckered us into the Iraq War. (Of course, some of you out there won’t believe this is true.) Months before Bush’s intelligence source, the CIA, told him Iraq (Saddam) did not represent any immediate threat. Weeks before the war began, Bush was asking how he could provoke Iraq into starting the war. But the worst thing George Bush did was to release an intelligence report supporting his claim for war, after he deleted the report’s conclusion that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction and was not a threat to anyone, other than the Iraqi people.

But that is not the whole story. Believe it or not, this story will live or die come November 4, 2008: Election Day! Do you know about candidate for Attorney General in Vermont? Charlotte Dennett has made a campaign promise: If she is elected Attorney General of Vermont, she will appoint Vincent Bugliosi a Special Prosecutor to indict, try and convict George W. Bush for murder.

Sounds like a plan to me.

As Vincent says and I believe: No one, including the President of the United States, is above the law.

Court TV will make millions, no billions!!!!

 
 Vincent Bugliosi, Author and Attorney [31:47m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (297)

Unanimous—Jim Powell Lives!!!! (In The 4th District)

The Georgia Supreme Court today ruled in Handel v Powell that Jim Powell, candidate for the Public Service Commission, District 4, was qualified to run.

You can read the entire opinion here, or this excerpt:

The superior court determined the Secretary made such an error of law when she concluded that the candidate’s homestead exemption on property outside the District was sufficient to determine that the candidate did not reside in the District.3 We agree with the superior court that the Secretary committed an error of law that authorizes reversal of the Secretary’s decision.

The Secretary acknowledged in her decision the existence in OCGA § 21-2-217 of “a set of rules” to be followed in determining residency to qualify to run for elective office, but employed only one of the fifteen rules contained in the set, the “homestead exemption” subsection. When the issue is the residence of a person desiring to qualify to run for elective office, OCGA § 21-2-217(a) directs that the rules contained therein are to be followed “so far as they are applicable[.]” The facts of the case at bar call into consideration at least seven of the fifteen rules: Subsections 1, 2, 3, 4.1, 6, and 9, as well as the homestead exemption rule found in subsection 14.4 but the Secretary’s decision did not take into account any of the applicable rules other than the homestead exemption rule. The Secretary’s analysis had the effect of elevating the “homestead exemption” rule of OCGA § 21-2-217(a) above the remaining rules contained therein, effectively eviscerating their application in any case questioning the qualifications of a candidate for elective office should the candidate own a home on which a homestead exemption is enjoyed. A statute must be construed “to give sensible and intelligent effect to all [its] provisions and to refrain from any interpretation which renders any part of the statute meaningless.” R. D. Brown Constrs. v. Bd. of Educ. of Columbia County, 280 Ga. 210, 212 (626 SE2d 471) (2006). Had the General Assembly intended such a preeminent role for the homestead exemption in determining the residence of a person desiring to qualify to run for elective office, it would have so stated in OCGA § 21-2 -217(a). Inasmuch as the superior court did not err when it reversed the decision of the Secretary, we affirm the judgment of the superior court.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

Race for Justice: Vermont and the Prosecution of George W. Bush

The Latest 538 Polls!

Obama: 348.2 Electoral Votes
McCain: 189.8 Electoral Votes

Obama: 52.1 % Popular Vote
McCain: 46.5 % Popular Vote

FiveThirtyEight.com says:

As before, the three critical races for any scenario in which the Democrats earn a 60-seat majority are the three vulnerable Republican incumbents in the South. These are Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, Saxby Chambliss in Georgia, and Roger Wicker in Mississippi. All three races lean Republican to the tune of about 2 points.

Jason Pye on Spreading the Wealth!

Here’s one to listen to, Pye and me! Or is that Pye and I? It has been a while since Jason and I mixed it up, but this interview was well worth the wait. A little heat, a lot of heart and absolutely no bull.

Of course, Jason, as a Libertarian, voted for Bob Barr. Bob Barr, you know, the Libertarian Candidate for President. Bob Barr, the ex-Republican (ain’t we all!)!!! That made Jason’s choice easy, but in an effort to help all you out there that may be undecided (about what, I have no idea), I decided to ask Jason why he would not vote for McCain. One word: Iraq! Good word, simple and to the point.

Jason agrees that McCain is toast, too far behind to ever catch up. Palin is not qualified to be a V.P. nominee. Obama has a chance to take Georgia. The Democrats may reach that magic number of 60, but even if they get close, they will have 2 or 3 Republicans they can count on. Sounds depressing. Makes me wonder why Republicans would even show up to vote.

We avoided discussing the “Bradley Effect.”

We fell into the abyss when I asked why he wouldn’t vote for Obama. One word: Taxes! Jason is much too nice of a guy for me to jump on him in print, but we did get into it. Jason thinks Obama is going to “spread the wealth around,” which makes Jason very uncomfortable. If Jason were a Republican I could say that Bush has been spreading the wealth around (to Halliburton, Blackwater, etc.) pretty good himself, but that doesn’t work with a Libertarian. They don’t like Bush either!

I could say, we are in the process of spreading the debts (Wall Street’s) around, so why not the wealth, but Jason doesn’t like the baleout either.

So what does “spread the wealth” mean? I guess only time will tell, but let me tell you what I think it means. It is nothing sinister or socialistic. Hundreds of thousands of people work for hundreds of companies all across America. They are good employees. They work hard. In this day and age, they are thankful for their jobs. They can’t quit their jobs, at least, not for a better job. Let’s say they make more than minimum wage, $10 an hour or $20,000 a year. They have 2 or 3 kids and live in a rental apartment of house. After the subprime mortgage fiasco, they will never buy a house because they will never get approved for a mortgage, because they will never save the 20% downpayment. Now, as a society, we expect them to raise good kids, productive kids, educated kids. We expect them to be good parents and to spend quality time with their families so they don’t end in a divorce. They are living from pay check to paycheck. (PLEASE NOTE: I think they would be living from paycheck to paycheck if they may 2 or 3 times as much, which is what most of us do.) By the way, if this is not a fairly accurate depiction of American families (maybe even, too rosy), someone tell me, because this is what I see everyday as a lawyer.

Now this person, this family, is maxed out. Another bill, an unexpected illness, a tax increase is going to cost them a lot, maybe everything.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX PAID: I would guess no more than $1,500.00 a year.

And then there is the person that owns one of these companies. He is a good person, a good manager, comes to the office everyday and does his part to make the company successful. He lives well, his kids go to private school, he takes at least 2 weeks of vacation and flies across the country to resorts to show his wife and kids the good life. He has an IRA that he contributes to regularly. He has two houses. He is saving for college, the best college, for his kids. He invests conservatively in the stock market and every once in a while makes some money. His annual income is $500,000.00. Please note, this does not equal taxable income, which is generally lower.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX PAID: Let’s say $120,000.00.

Now, assume the government is $10 trillion in debt. (Contrary to popular disbelief, there is a rational basis for this assumption.)

Whose taxes should you raise? Whose minimum wage should be higher?

Can you solve the problem? How about it Jason? Love ya, man!

 
 Jason Pye, Libertarian and Political Commentator [31:52m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (466)

Immigration and the Local Option Enforcement of Our Laws

In all the presidential debates, in all the political commercials, in all the talking points, you don’t really hear much about immigration, or more accurately, the issue of illegal aliens and what to do about the flow of people across our border with Mexico. You may hear a soundbite here or there. Just about every candidate will use phrases like “immigration reform,” or “secure our borders” or a dozen others. What you won’t hear is in-depth, detailed discussion of what this really means? You won’t see finger pointing because the fingers point to everyone. You will not hear anyone say that if elected they will get the fence built. You will not hear national politicians pledge to enforce our laws, punish employers who break it and deport illegal aliens.

The reason you won’t hear much about these issues is because no one wants to lose the Hispanic vote. You won’t hear much because everyone’s position, on the national level, at least, is basically the same: amnesty (code word: immigration reform) is coming, so do not fight it too hard!

Well, that ain’t necessarily so. Last year, a grassroots uprising stopped a bipartisan effort to grant amnesty for illegal aliens. That uprising convinced our Georgia Senators Chambliss and Isakson to change their position from one of support to a vote against the legislation. which side of the issue they had better be on if they wanted to get re-elected. Both of them had supported the Bush Administration and the Republican plan for amnesty.

There are those for whom the fight goes on daily. It will go on every year in Congress until one side or the other is the victor. D. A. King is one of those determined to win. D. A. founded The Dustin Inman Society after a 16 year-old boy, Dustin Inman, was killed in a automobile accident with a driver, an illegal alien, who had legally obtained a North Carolina driver’s license, even though he was here illegally. Sure, similar accidents occur every day that do not involve illegal alien drivers. Nevertheless, it is equally true that if an illegal alien could not get a driver’s license, Dustin Inman would not have died on the day he did.

If the issue on the national level is on hold until after the election, the fight on the local level only intensifies. The fight has become a grassroots effort to do what the national government won’t do: enforce our immigration laws. In this interview D. A. King emphasizes the effort in Georgia and elsewhere to get local law enforcement agencies to enforce immigration laws and undertake efforts to deport illegal aliens.

In 1996 Congress passed Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act which allows the authority to enforce our federal immigration laws to be formally delegated to local law enforcement agencies. Thus, if the federal government won’t enforce the laws, communities that want to do so can obtain that power by compliance with Section 287(g).

Not all communities and law enforcement agencies participate in the 287(g) partnership with the federal government. Some have tried, without success, which is difficult to understand. The Cobb County Sheriff’s Office does.

On the state level, in 2006 the General Assembly passed the Georgia Security and Compliance Act. The Act requires Georgia employers working on public contracts to verify legal status of applicants using the E-Verify database provided by the federal government. It requires the Georgia Commissioner of Public Safety to establish a 287(g) program for Georgia, requires law enforcement officers to make a reasonable effort to determine immigration status of individuals in their custody and to report problems to Homeland Security, and a variety of other requirements intended to deal effectively with the issue of illegal aliens in Georgia.

Some of you may not agree with D. A. I didn’t–at first. In fact, the reason I first interviewed him was to tell him that I thought it was an exaggerated, inflammatory issue, inspired by Republican conservative to get out the vote in 2006.

Well, D. A. changed my thinking by giving me facts, not soundbites. It is not a racial issue, it is an economic issue, and more importantly an issue of law and sovereignty. As D. A. points out, Mexico enforces its immigration laws to the maximum. Why don’t we? For that you will need to think and do some research if you want to find the answer on your own. Check out Numbers USA, GrassFire.org, and The Dustin Inman Society.

If you don’t have time to do the research, I will tell you the simple answer: Corporate power and cheap labor. It is the business community that wants what illegal aliens have to offer, unlimited cheap labor, at the expense of the American worker. The ultimate goal is the free flow of labor across our borders. In the 1990s NAFTA exported our manufacturing plants, leaving us with jobs that could not be outsourced. In this decade the effort has been to outsource the labor, though illegal employees, for the remaining jobs.

Don’t believe me? Your problem, not mine.

 
 D. A. King, Founder, The Dustin Inman Society [29:28m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (362)

“Unsettled: The Problem of Loving Israel”

If you are an American, you must be for Israel, or at least that is the way it seems. It is certainly political suicide to speak ill of Israel. Please note, my reference is to the nation of Israel, not the Jewish religion. We tend to equate the two, even though there is a larger percentage of Arabs as citizens of Israel, than African Americans citizens of America.

Author Marc Aronson is Jewish. Many of his family live in Israel. Marc visits often. In his book “Unsettled: The Problem of Loving Israel” Marc says that Israel is, today, dealing with the issues of segregation and discrimination toward “Arab citizens of Israel” that America dealt with 40 years ago. These are not Palestinians living in the occupied territories, like the West Bank or Gaza. These are Arabs whose families have lived in the State of Israel since its creation in 1948. They vote and can even hold public office, though they rarely do. The only thing they don’t do is serve in the Israeli Army.

Is Israel only for Jews? Should non-Jews leave? Is there something wrong when an ethnic group comprising 20% of the population owns only 4% of the land? Is Israel pursuing policies that relieve these growing pressures or which obscure them until they erupt?

Marc explores the attitudes and contradictions of a persecuted people who are or should be dealing with issues of discrimination and persecution of Arab citizens. The question is to what extent does this contradiction bode good or evil for the ulitmate future and security of Israel? Marc’s point is not to criticize, but to point to a gathering storm, for just as surely as these issues caught up with America 100 years after the Emancipation Proclamation, they will linger within Israeli society until they are dealt with, either constructively or destructively.

The subtleties and complexities of these issues have discouraged me from even attempting to boil down this emotional journey into a few sentences. If you love Israel or have a problem loving Israel, read the book! It will make you think.

 
 Marc Aronson, Author [30:44m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (284)

Savannah Daily News Endorses Barrow and Gillespie for Congress!

The Savannah Daily News has made its endorsements for Congress in the 1st and 12th District. Their selections:

Bill Gillespie for the 1st District.

John Barrow for the 12th District.

This is the first time SDN has not endorsed Jack Kingston. The edorsement explains why:

……It is painful to no longer endorse our friend, Jack Kingston. Many of us know Jack and his family personally and cherish their friendship and their public service. Jack Kingston is a good man, personally, but he has never had a viable or credible Democratic opponent to truly consider.

And these times force us to step back, and take a hard look at his actual voting record on critical issues including fighting all measures to set a timeline to get out of Iraq, his failure to fight runaway Federal spending as a member of the House Appropriations committee that develops the budget, his leadership in defense of Tom Delay and President Bush as well as Republican party smear campaigns this election cycle, and his failure to file his personal financial disclosure information due last May 15 even though he was up for re-election. These votes and others lead us to believe that it is time for a change in 1st District representation.

Frankly, Jack began to lose our support last Feb. 27 when he appeared on the Dan Abrams show and said it was okay to “question Sen. Barack Obama’s patriotism because he doesn’t regularly wear an American flag lapel pin.”

Problem was, sitting there on the TV set with the cameras rolling, Jack wasn’t wearing a flag pin. These types of smear tactics are repugnant and demean elected officials in an era when voters are begging for straight talk on the issues versus old-style personal attack politics.

Yet, he continues to try to use such tactics, seeking to smear his opponent Bill Gillespie in this race, accusing him of lying about his educational degrees and other achievements, despite two news organizations having confirmed that Gillespie’s resume is accurate………

And its reasons for endorsing John Barrow are:

John Barrow deserves our support for another term as the Congressman from Georgia’s 12th District.

While his voting patterns may not be liberal enough for some in the 12th District, particularly in the Savannah area, his legal mind continues to serve us well, demonstrating a pattern of pulling apart legislation and voting on the quality of a bill and its intention versus just following a straight political party line.

He voted against the bailout bill because there was “too much downside for the taxpayer. There were specific areas of fraud and abuse that were skillfully manipulated out of the final product,” he says. That approach to in-depth study is what we depend on from our elected representatives.

And we must send representatives to Congress who will take tough stands on the legislative issues ahead for the 111th congress, issues in addition to current financial crisis matters. One of those issues for the 12th Congressional District is needed reform of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation, up for renewal in the next session. Improving public schools and developing a more qualified work force are seismic issues for the district.

Barrow shares our views, believing that NCLB was a good idea that “got hijacked from how it was designed. There is nothing wrong with standards, nothing wrong with being sure that Georgia is getting the same bang for its educational buck as Texas, but the Bush administration failed from the beginning to fund the bill, which is exactly what they promised they would not do if it was enacted,” he states. “So we’re raiding the local tax base to continue to fund federally mandated educational programs.” We couldn’t make these important points any more succinctly than John’s own words.

A 2008 study from the U.S. Department of Education, in the recently released “Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report,” states that the performance of students in 12 states who were in grades one to three during the 2004-5 and 2005-6 school years and completed the Reading First Program, a major billion dollar a year NCLB effort, had proven “ineffective.” A final report on the impacts from 2004-2007 (three school years with Reading First funding) and on the relationships between changes in instructional practice and student reading comprehension is expected in late 2008. It’s an issue ahead that needs tough analysis, and tough stands to ensure funding in a time when there will be little money to spare.

His opponent, John Stone (R), represents the old school party politics of big lobbyists and insider power players. He has spoken out on few issues in this campaign with the exception of his recent one-day media event in Savannah to propose his solution to the U.S. economic crisis, including ideas that cannot be enacted, such as imposing a moratorium on home mortgage foreclosures.

Barrow has high marks and endorsements from business organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. And his position on immigration is realistic in light of the needs of Georgia and the 12th District. He supports securing the borders and enforcing the laws we have but without dramatic measures supported by many.

Most importantly, John Barrow is accessible and in the district often, spending endless weekends in its small towns, meeting face-to-face with voters, versus leaving all the constituent work to paid staffers.

John Barrow is a Blue Dog, fiscal conservative Democrat in an era when we’re all feeling pretty blue about the economy, and we need his take on the solutions

Have You Seen Your School’s Report Card?

It is difficult to get a handle on just about anything that involves education, but there is a new source of information for the public that is interesting and, hopefully, useful. In this interview, Kelly McCutchen, Executive Vice President of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, explains the information available to the public regarding each school’s budget. Now, anyone can check a school’s report card and find out all sorts of things. Like….

Where does the school rank among other schools throughout the state?

What percentage of students are from families who live in poverty?

The amount of money spent by the school per student.

The amount of central office spending per student.

All sorts of things.

There are schools with high poverty rates whose performance exceeds expectations. Within the same school district, there are schools whose performance vary significantly from school to school. There are schools that spend a lot more per student that other schools, but with no significant difference in performance.

I am not sure there is any overall conclusion that can be drawn from the information available in the report card. However, it would appear that schools succeed or fail without regard to poverty, and without regard to per student spending. That leads me to believe that the difference that matters has to do with something other than money, such as the leadership of the school administration and the creativity of the teachers. If this is true, then every school should be able to succeed, all it needs is leadership and creative teachers. I am sure this is an oversimplification, but I am equally sure that leadership and creativity are a large part of it.

 
 Kelly McCutchen, Georgia Policy [32:26m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (405)

Toombs County Political Forum - General Election 2008

What Is Goin’ On and WLYU Radio 100.9 FM, Lyons, held the 2nd Toombs County Political Forum at the Blue Marquee Theatre in Lyons, Georgia on October 26, 2008. If you want to listen to country politics, here it is.

Candidates for Probate Court Judge:

Stan Bazemore
Larry Threlkeld (i)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Candidates for State Court Judge:

Macky Bryant
Tommy J. Smith (i)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Candidate for Board of Education, District 6:

Ann Bullard

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Candidates for County Commission:

Chairman:
James Thompson (D)
Buddy West (R)

District 3:
Adam Moore (D)
Harry (Skeeter) Toole (R)

District 2:
Lorenzo Folsom (D)
Louie Powell (R-i)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.