Monthly Archive for February, 2008

Rand Knight, Democratic Candidate, U. S. Senate - GA

When I asked Rand Knight why he was running for US Senate, his reply was he was fed up. Fed up with Saxby voting against the middle class. Fed up with exporting jobs over seas. Fed up with the government taking care of the top 1% of society while the rest of us that work every day for a living are left without health care and our kids don’t have a decent education.

What can I say? I am fed up as well, but fed up is inadequate to describe my disgust at politics in general and the Republican horde in particular. While I am glad that the 2008 presidential race stands to make history with the election of either the first woman or the first African-American, I would much prefer it if people were voting for candidates that are fed up, candidates that are more than a little mad. I want to vote for candidates that are truly, passionately fed up. When we, the people, are fed up enough to elect candidates that are fed up (and I mean really fed up), maybe we can eventually get enough of them in Washington to actually change something.

Rand sounded like he was a little mad, as well as fed up. As he points out, there is a lot to be fed up about. How about the soldiers that have had to do 2 or 3 tours in Iraq? Or maybe, its the fact that we are building colleges and roads and hospitals in Iraq, while ordinary folk in America can’t afford to take their kids to the doctor, even though they work more than one job. And let’s not forget the drug manufacturers and health insurance companies that are making billions in profit while everyone else in the healthcare morass is overcharged and underpaid. On top of that, our government gives the drug companies billions of dollars in subsidies so they can charge Americans more for their drugs than they charge other countries like Canada.

In particular, Rand is fed up with Saxby Chambliss’ whom he says is too busy doing the bidding of the major oil companies to do anything about the high gas prices at the pump. Rand points out that Saxby always supports tax breaks (corporate welfare) for these rich, multi-national corporations, while opposing the farm bill provisions that would afford some protection to our family farmers.

According to recent polls, Saxby’s approval rating is about 38%, the lowest of any other US Senator.

Rand appears to be a Southern Democrat in the mold of Richard Russell and Sam Nunn, politicians who understood the meaning of bipartisanship, and fiscal responsibility. Rand does not favor raising taxes, but neither does he favor giving tax breaks to the richest 1%. He points out that while the Bush administration is spending billions on the war in Iraq, it is neglecting the basic infrastructure of our armed forces. For example, the navy has fewer than 4oo ships today. Ten years ago it had 1200 ships and 20 years ago it had 2000 ships.

As a fiscal conservative, Rand believes in a balanced budget. One aspect of fiscal responsibility is becoming energy independent. Rand has a Ph.D. in Ecosystems Analysis and is eager to push alternative energy sources. He believes that with planning and foresight Georgia can become the biggest exporter of energy on the east coast.

As for the war in Iraq, Rand says that he talks to a lot of people coming back from the war, and that most all of them say that having troops on the ground in Iraq generates a lot of hostility toward America and increases terrorism.

Rand’s mother was a teacher, a member of the teacher’s union, and he is a supporter of organized labor.

Rand points out that on Super Tuesday more Democrats voted in Georgia than Republicans. If that happens in November, Saxby could be gone. He has been to 60 Georgia counties in the last 4 months trying to get his message out.

Only 99 more to go, Rand!

 
 Rand Knight, Democratic Candidate, Senate-GA [26:47m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (98)

Lawyers, Sugar and Liberty: Give me your poor, your injured, your sick!

I enjoy lawyer jokes as much as anyone, but I have little patience with people that enjoy bashing lawyers. The latest round of lawyer bashing was sparked by the Sugar Refinery tragedy in Savannah. Within days lawyers from other states placed advertisements in the local papers advising the injured and their families they were ready and willing to help. Of course, everyone interpreted this as “ambulance chasing,” or “trolling for clients.”

If such blatant advertising offends anyone’s sensibilities, then let me point out one thing: THIS WAS NOT DONE BY GEORGIA LAWYERS!! So let’s don’t bash everyone, just because some lawyer did something you don’t like.

But the real question I want to ask is this: Why would anyone be offended by an advertisement like this? Of course, the easy answer is something like this: It doesn’t show respect for the injured and their families. It’s greedy. It’s ….whatever!

I am not sure I buy this logic, but assuming this is true, is this the result of timing or content? What if the same ad were placed a week later, a month later? Would that result in lawyer bashing?

Would it have made any difference if the ad had been placed by a local Georgia lawyer as opposed to someone from Texas?

In this interview Joseph (Joe) Watkins, an Atlanta lawyer and current President of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, Mark Tate, a Savannah attorney and I, discuss the controversy in an effort to explain and offer insight into why lawyers advertise. By the way, Mark’s law firm sponsors a TV show called “Law Call” which airs every Sunday night at 11:30 p.m. on one of the Savannah stations.

And let me make one thing clear: I am not talking about lawyers in general, only those targets of partisan politics, the “personal injury lawyer”, the “trial lawyer,” the “plaintiff’s attorney.” I am proud to be one. Call us what you will, we devote our professional lives trying to obtain justice for people who are wronged by others. That wrong may have caused a minor injury or a catastrophic one. It may have resulted in the wrongful termination of a good employee from a 20-year employment position. The trial lawyer, together with the courts, stands up for people that cannot stand up for themselves. Sometimes those people are rich, but many, many more are just normal, ordinary people who have been hurt. Pray you don’t ever need a lawyer, but pray that if you do, you get a good trial lawyer to stand up for you.

But the issue is lawyer advertising! There are lots of people, lawyers and non-lawyers alike, who mock the Ken Nugent ads. “One Call” my &^%(.!

Lawyers advertise for the same reason that every other business in the nation advertises: to get business. They also happen to have a constitutional right to advertise. If you have a problem with that, then I assume you equally condemn doctors who advertise. After all, don’t they simply want to make money? Don’t they want to charge you thousands of dollars out of your pocket at the very point in time that you can least afford it–when you are sick and dying. Is that any less a tragedy? If your response is that doctors do a lot of good while making money, I will be the first to agree. But, that is exactly what lawyers do–a lot of good while making money.

Of course, the issue is not that lawyers advertise, but that they do it after a catastrophe and they do it in public for all the world to see. It’s kind of like watching TV with your family when the Viagra ad comes on the screen.

As Mark points out, within hours, if not minutes after the incident, the Sugar Refinery had lawyers and insurance adjusters getting out of bed in the middle of the night to start protecting the rights of the people that may have done something wrong, the ones that caused or could have prevented the catastrophe. The injured and dead and their familites need lawyers, too. Sure, you can say they don’t need them that night, but truthfully, that isn’t exactly true. Evidence is being gathered, ignored, contaminated, hidden, lost and stories are being spun within hours of such an incident.

I can tell you that if my best friend was one of the people injured and he called me minutes after the explosion, I would be in the car and at the scene as soon as possible. And, here is the point I want to make: no one would see anything wrong with that because my friend called me. But what about the person that doesn’t know a lawyer? What does he do? How does he go about hiring a lawyer?

A lot of injured people, whether in a car accident or a catastrophe, have never had a lawyer and don’t know a lawyer. There isn’t anyone for them to call. Many times they don’t even know they have legal rights, much less rights that need protecting. Sometimes they even assume their employer is gong to take care of them. Yeah, right?

And this is my point. Advertisements after a catastrophe are not as sinister as some people, the media in particular, might want you to think. Bashing lawyers makes good copy. Some lawyers may run an ad and others may not. If you aren’t the one that needs a lawyer, you probably don’t care. The truth is that any advertisement at any time, before or after a catastrophe, is a poor basis upon which to hire a lawyer. You wouldn’t buy a house or a car based on an ad alone and you certainly shouldn’t hire a lawyer based on an advertisement. Always find out what the reputation of the lawyer is. Does he actually go to court? Does he really try case. Are the insurance companies really scared of him? (NO!)

Don’t know who to call or how to do that? Ask around! Someone always knows a good lawyer. Go to the court house watch a few in action.

But for goodness sakes, don’t act like the world is coming to an end because a lawyer ran an ad in the paper, even if you think it was in poor taste.

 
 Lawyer Advertising: Fact and Fiction [28:01m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (91)

Casey Cagle on Water and the 2008 Session

This interview with Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle took place last week and my apologies to Casey for not posting it sooner. It took place the day before a significant court ruling in the “water wars” between Georgia, Alabama and Florida. That decision dealt a significant blow to Governor Perdue’s assertions that Georgia, not Alabama, not Florida, not the Corps of Engineers, would control the flow of water out of Lake Lanier. According to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Georgia has no right to take any water out of Lake Lanier for drinking water use without the approval of Congress. The Court’s decision is well worth a read. The main opinion is less than 20 pages, but it gives a good overview of the water wars that have swirled around Lake Lanier.

When you consider that Lake Lanier presently supplies almost a third of the water used by Georgians (all of them in metro Atlanta), this decision could have an immediate and significant impact on the metro area.

I was amazed that the Statewide Water Plan made it through the legislature with such speed and has already been signed by the Governor. With all the controversy surrounding the Plan (at least I thought there was controversy), I assumed the Plan was going to be the subject of hearings and debate. What happened? Casey says the universal support is the result of the good job the Water Council did in developing the Plan. He gives his full stamp of approval to the Plan and assured me that Atlanta was not going to steal my South Georgia water. What more can I ask for?

Only time will tell. Another reason for the lack of opposition may be due to the fact that there really isn’t much to the Plan. It doesn’t constitute a law or a regulation. It is more of an organizational plan that will have to be judged after the dozens of members are appointed and begin their work. I doubt the Plan will have any immediate impact on the water problems.

As for opposition to the Plan, Casey referred to a “very radical environmental viewpoint” that was asserted by some opponents as a scare tactic. I assume this refers to the Riverkeeper organizations. Whether their concerns prove justified, only time will tell!

As for the long-term water solution, there are 11 reservoirs in the planning stage, primarily for municipal water supplies. Casey also said there would be a minimum of $30 million in the budget for water issues.

Another major area of legislative attention this year is health care. According to Casey the uninsured population increases the cost of health care for the rest of us. An average family of 3 pays about $1000 a year in additional premiums just to cover the cost of medical care provided to the uninsured. The legislature is considering two initiatives: safety net clinics and a website which would allow consumers to shop for health care plans on a more competitive basis.

As part of the safety net clinics, incentives would be provided to communities that provide preventative health care to individuals who can’t afford it. I am not sure what this means, but be on the lookout for prohibitions and restrictions on suing safety net clinics and their doctors in the event they kill you!

As for the web based marketplace, I am not sure how that will work either. The concern here is that the insurance industry is allowed to offer all sorts of coverage plans, including the one that covers 100% of you medical expenses if you are bitten by a cobra while standing on your head! Read the fine print!

Casey also discussed an effort to provide coverage for catastrophic illness to the 25 and under age group who don’t like to pay for health insurance because as we all know, the young are invincible. They are also the biggest group of people that are uninsured. The catastrophic policy might cost as little as $45 a month.

On the transportation front, Casey indicates that the DOT is undergoing restructuring and modernization. But what about traffic? What about metro traffic? How about movable lanes? Most of us have seen the heavy traffic going one way in the morning and the other way in the evening. According to Casey the state of Virginia has movable lanes. So do other places! Sounds weird, but it may provide some relief. The biggest problem I see is that if Georgia continues to grow in population and cars, all the lanes in one direction may not be enough in 20 years. And that is the problem. No one is working on a solution that will deal with the long-term. Only time will tell!

Speaker Richardson’s Great Property Tax Plan is dead, but Casey says property owners, both residential and commercial, need relief from an ever increasing property tax burden. He suggests the legislature is considering a cap of 2% or 3% on annual tax increases. Also, local property tax assessments might be frozen until local jurisdictions establish a uniform assessment process. Frankly, I thought we had one.

Casey points out that the Governor has cut the state portion of property taxes by 1/4 mil.

Some consideration is also being giving to eliminating the income tax on senior citizens. Since I am close to being a senior citizen, I am all for this.

As for education, there will be austerity cuts. We did not have time to discuss what they might be.

And what about Georgia’s economic future? Casey says we will see a slowdown in Georgia’s economy. Inflation is up, credit is tight, foreclosure rates are up. But Georgia has always weathered economic downturns better than a lot of states. I hope this continues to be the case.

 
 Casey Cagle, Lt. Governor of Georgia [28:32m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (113)

There’s A Bully in the House!

Way too much of this interview dwelt on that insignificantly small person that parades as Speaker of the Georgia House, Glenn What’s His Name. Jason Pye describes the recent vengance wreaked by the Speaker on those members of the House who dared to vote against his choice for DOT Commissioner from the 9th District. Banished and stripped of power, the Speaker certainly knows how influence people. I am not sure about winning friends. Arrogance and pettiness are his trademarks. Bullying is his tactic. I applaud his perverse sense of leadership solely because I am sure it will ultimately seal his fate. It is only a matter of time.

If Richardson were a child he would have been disciplined (somewhere between spanking and beating) months, if not years, ago. He might even have done a tour in “juvy” for attitude correction. But, apparently the other Republican members of the House enjoy being abused, harrassed, threatened and deprived of any claim to manhood–if you know what I mean. Too bad there isn’t one leader among them with the balls to stand up to a brat.

What really gets me is the possibility that all this strutting and strong-arming is somehow a prelude to a gubernatorial campaign in 2010. (Good Lord, will it be that long before Sonny leaves!) Pick up a mirror Glenn, and kiss your political future goodbye. Tick, tick, tick……

We mention briefly the quick approval of the Water Plan. Jason doesn’t appear to be overly concerned about the ultimate implementation of this plan. His reasoning: it can always be changed, if need be. (They said the same thing about the Constitution!) I still have a lot of friends who think the Water Plan is nothing more than a plan for Atlanta to get more water and the rest of the state, less water. The total lack of debate over it still makes me think that politics is at work behind the scenes on this one. We will just have to wait a decade or so and see how it goes.

The credit freeze bill and the gun at work bill passed the House.

Jason finally convinces me that talking about mass public transportation in Atlanta is nothing more than misplaced nostalgia for what could have been. Let’s face it, Atlanta is going to be concrete gridlock forever. There is no hope to improve, much less eliminate the problem. The leadership that was needed came and went 40 yers ago. Until we have personal transport vehicles that fly, Atlantans will continue to fight traffic and hate it. Move south!

In a parting comment about voting on Super Tuesday, Jason gives a plea: Don’t vote for Huckabee! Jason characterizes Huckabee as a tax and spend liberal from Arkansas. Huckabee scares me because he confuses religion and government, something Jesus never did. Alas, our comments were to no avail. Georgians, at least the Republican part of the state, continue to prove that we have no idea what the Constitution of the United States says or what it means.

Jason keeps up the legislature in Georgia Legislative Watch. You should, too.

 
 Jason Pye, Blogger, Political Commentator [27:55m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (119)