Monthly Archive for November, 2007

Want to Support Teachers? Try Donors Choose!

Jeff Wood is the Southeast Executive Director of DonorsChoose.org. According to Jeff, teachers spend an average of $500 to $600 a year out of their own pockets buying supplies and other necessities to use in the classrooms. The purpose of DonorsChoose.org is to connect teachers who need money to fund projects with people who are willing to donate funds. All contributions are tax deductible.

I also did not know that teachers can claim a tax deduction of up to $250 a year for personal funds they spend for teaching supplies.

Charles Best began DonorsChoose 7 years ago in the Bronx, blending technology and philanthropy. The challenge is to get the word out so that teachers know help is available. DonorsChoose got a boost in 2003 when Best appeared “Oprah.” A few months ago it was Craig Newmark appearing on “The Colbert Report.” Today, it’s Jeff Wood on “What Is Goin’ On?” I guess the world knows by now.

This isn’t a give-away program. This is how it works: The teacher prepares a proposal requesting funds in a specific amount. DonorsChoose screens the proposal, and if approved it is posted on the site where donors can contribute. The funds are controlled by DonorsChoose. They buy the supplies or whatever it is and send it to the teacher. As you can imagine, DonorsChoose invests a significant amount of time investigating the validity of the request and facilitating the procurement of goods and for that it charges a fee which is added to the total request and funded by the donors.

The average proposal is $400. The largest request that was funded was a $20,000.00 playground in New York. Since its creation, it has funded over $14 million in teacher proposals.

If you go to the website, you can search for proposals by location or category. You can help fund a proposal in the hometown you haven’t visited in 30 years. You can give a Gift Certificate.

Since it is tax-exempt, you can also donate directly to DonorsChoose if you can’t decided what project to fund.

 
 Standard Podcast [30:38m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (177)

Are You Ready to Say: “We Won’t Take It Anymore!”

Doug Monroe sent me the link to this speech by Salt Lake City Mayor, Ross C. “Rocky” Anderson, October 27, 2007. It is a little long, but well worth the read.

Don’t read it unless you are in a place where you can stand up and shout at the end. Let me know if you want to join a write-in campaign for “Ross for President.” I even found another speech by this guy! And another. I don’t know who writes his material, but if Ross won’t run, I say elect the speechwriter.

Here is a PDF version, if you want one for some reason.

Salt Lake City, Utah —

Today, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah’s entire congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: “You have failed us miserably and we won’t take it any more.”

“While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss.”

“You have breached trust with the American people in the most egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of law.”

“You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of the sort never before countenanced in our nation’s history as a matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a coherent plan for this monumental blunder.”

“We are here to tell you: We won’t take it any more!”

“You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship contemptuous of our nation’s treaty obligations, federal statutory law, our Constitution, and the rule of law.”

“Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false ‘patriotism,’ our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised, and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before.

It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense – when what you have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling – and disgraceful. What part of “Thou shalt not kill” do you not understand? What part of the “Golden rule” do you not understand? What part of “be honest,” “be responsible,” and “be accountable” don’t you understand? What part of “Blessed are the peacekeepers” do you not understand?

Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries, and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to say, as loudly as we can, ‘We won’t take it any more!’ ”

“As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true to our nation’s values, and with high moral principles to stand in your places – for the good of our nation, for the good of our children, and for the good of our world.”

In the case of the President and Vice President, this means impeachment and removal from office, without any further delay from a complacent, complicit Congress, the Democratic majority of which cares more about political gain in 2008 than it does about the vindication of our Constitution, the rule of law, and democratic accountability.

It means the election of people as President and Vice President who, unlike most of the presidential candidates from both major parties, have not aided and abetted in the perpetration of the illegal, tragic, devastating invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it means the election of people as President and Vice President who will commit to return our nation to the moral and strategic imperative of refraining from torturing human beings.

In the case of the majority of Congress, it means electing people who are diligent enough to learn the facts, including reading available National Intelligence Estimates, before voting to go to war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will jealously guard Congress’s sole prerogative to declare war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will not submit like vapid lap dogs to presidential requests for blank checks to engage in so-called preemptive wars, for legislation permitting warrantless wiretapping of communications involving US citizens, and for dangerous, irresponsible, saber-rattling legislation like the recent Kyl-Lieberman amendment.

We must avoid the trap of focusing the blame solely upon President Bush and Vice-President Cheney. This is not just about a few people who have wronged our country – and the world. They were enabled by members of both parties in Congress, they were enabled by the pathetic mainstream news media, and, ultimately, they have been enabled by the American people – 40% of whom are so ill-informed they still think Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks – a people who know and care more about baseball statistics and which drunken starlets are wearing underwear than they know and care about the atrocities being committed every single day in our name by a government for which we need to take responsibility.

As loyal Americans, without regard to political partisanship — as veterans, as teachers, as religious leaders, as working men and women, as students, as professionals, as businesspeople, as public servants, as retirees, as people of all ages, races, ethnic origins, sexual orientations, and faiths — we are here to say to the Bush administration, to the majority of Congress, and to the mainstream media: “You have violated your solemn responsibilities. You have undermined our democracy, spat upon our Constitution, and engaged in outrageous, despicable acts. You have brought our nation to a point of immorality, inhumanity, and illegality of immense, tragic, unprecedented proportions.”

“But we will live up to our responsibilities as citizens, as brothers and sisters of those who have suffered as a result of the imperial bullying of the United States government, and as moral actors who must take a stand: And we will, and must, mean it when we say ‘We won’t take it any more.’”

If we want principled, courageous elected officials, we need to be principled, courageous, and tenacious ourselves. History has demonstrated that our elected officials are not the leaders – the leadership has to come from us. If we don’t insist, if we don’t persist, then we are not living up to our responsibilities as citizens in a democracy – and our responsibilities as moral human beings. If we remain silent, we signal to Congress and the Bush administration – and to candidates running for office – and to the world – that we support the status quo.

Silence is complicity. Only by standing up for what’s right and never letting down can we say we are doing our part.

Our government, on the basis of a campaign we now know was entirely fraudulent, attacked and militarily occupied a nation that posed no danger to the United States. Our government, acting in our name, has caused immense, unjustified death and destruction.

It all started five years ago, yet where have we, the American people, been? At this point, we are responsible. We get together once in a while at demonstrations and complain about Bush and Cheney, about Congress, and about the pathetic news media. We point fingers and yell a lot. Then most people politely go away until another demonstration a few months later.

How many people can honestly say they have spent as much time learning about and opposing the outrages of the Bush administration as they have spent watching sports or mindless television programs during the past five years? Escapist, time-sapping sports and insipid entertainment have indeed become the opiate of the masses.

Why is this country so sound asleep? Why do we abide what is happening to our nation, to our Constitution, to the cause of peace and international law and order? Why are we not doing all in our power to put an end to this madness?

We should be in the streets regularly and students should be raising hell on our campuses. We should be making it clear in every way possible that apologies or convoluted, disingenuous explanations just don’t cut it when presidential candidates and so many others voted to authorize George Bush and his neo-con buddies to send American men and women to attack and occupy Iraq.

Let’s awaken, and wake up the country by committing here and now to do all each of us can to take our nation back. Let them hear us across the country, as we ask others to join us: “We won’t take it any more!”

I implore you: Draw a line. Figure out exactly where your own moral breaking point is. How much will you put up with before you say “No more” and mean it?

I have drawn my line as a matter of simple personal morality: I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has voted to fund the atrocities in Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who will not commit to remove all US troops, as soon as possible, from Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has supported legislation that takes us one step closer to attacking Iran. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has not fought to stop the kidnapping, disappearances, and torture being carried on in our name.

If we expect our nation’s elected officials to take us seriously, let us send a powerful message they cannot misunderstand. Let them know we really do have our moral breaking point. Let them know we have drawn a bright line. Let them know they cannot take our support for granted – that, regardless of their party and regardless of other political considerations, they will not have our support if they cannot provide, and have not provided, principled leadership.

The people of this nation may have been far too quiet for five years, but let us pledge that we won’t let it go on one more day – that we will do all we can to put an end to the illegalities, the moral degradation, and the disintegration of our nation’s reputation in the world.

Let us be unified in drawing the line – in declaring that we do have a moral breaking point. Let us insist, together, in supporting our troops and in gratitude for the freedoms for which our veterans gave so much, that we bring our troops home from Iraq, that we return our government to a constitutional democracy, and that we commit to honoring the fundamental principles of human rights.

In defense of our country, in defense of our Constitution, in defense of our shared values as Americans – and as moral human beings – we declare today that we will fight in every way possible to stop the insanity, stop the continued military occupation of Iraq, and stop the moral depravity reflected by the kidnapping, disappearing, and torture of people around the world.

Robert Kuttner: “The Squandering of America”

Robert Kuttner is a co-founder and co-editor of The American Prospect magazine. While he writes on a variety of subjects, he focuses on economic policy, both domestic and international. He also writes a syndicated editorial column, which was awarded the John Hancock Award for excellence in business and financial journalism. Robert has also won the Jack London Award for labor journalism.

In his new book “The Squandering of America” he explores the history, the politics and the social forces that have turned the American Dream into a pipe dream for many Americans. In this day and time when everything seems screwed up, backwards, and headed down the wrong road generally, the word “squandering” sums up exactly how I feel. Seven years ago, I was dumb and happy and thought America was in pretty good shape. Today, I am disgusted, frustrated and regularly mad as hell. While this turn of events snuck up on me, it seems overnight, Robert was ahead of the curve. He wrote “Revolt of the Haves: Tax Rebellions and Hard Times” in 1980. I can’t say I have read that one, but I can imagine the plot, considering the fact that 27 years later, I am living it.

To put it bluntly, Robert thinks we (Americans) are in trouble. We don’t like to hear this. We much prefer to believe the soft lies from the people in power or who want to be in power. It’s like the water shortage in Atlanta. The critical nature of the crisis surprises and concerns most of us and who do we turn to for the solution: the people that either created the problem or ignored the problem at a time when it could have been solved. If responsibility is the theme of the day, why is no one being held responsible about anything?

It is obvious that Robert believes a lot of the current problems are the result of government’s failure to regulate business. In years past, we blamed government for being inefficient, wasteful and incompetent. This led to a general disdain for government regulation and a reliance on the free market to correct itself. Now, it is not the general ineffectiveness of government that is the problem, it is the fact that government simply isn’t involved.

You don’t have to look any further than toys from China. The Consumer Product Safety Commission which should be protecting our children from crappy toys is underfunded and understaffed because we prefer less government and tax cuts. The crazy thing is that the Acting Chairwoman (Acting?) told Congress the Commission didn’t want more money or more authority. Now that is a mentality that should be foreign to us, but half of us in this country think it is just great to eviscerate government. Tell that crap to the kids that died from the lead poisoning!

Think about it. If we didn’t have government regulation, your water might not be fit to drink, your car might not have air bags and your medicine might kill you. Regulation is not a bad thing. Bad regulation may be. Inefficiency may be. But, we threw the baby out with the bathwater. Government waste and inefficiency are not legitimate reasons to abandon any and all regulation.

According to Robert, Reagan began this experiment in the ability of the free market to regulate itself. It is an experiment he thinks has failed. The free market has turned Wall Street into a casino, where people don’t invest so much as gamble. The subprime mortgage scandal is the free, unregulated market at work.

The answer to this squandering is new leadership. Robert obviously favors Democrats over Republicans, although he isn’t convinced the DP is strong enough to lead us in a new direction. He doesn’t think Democrats have been looking out for the little guy. He points to the ‘06 election and successful campaigns like that of Jim Webb for Governor of Virginia to support his contention that people want leaders who are concerned about the plight of the middle class. According to Kuttner, Webb started out running to the right of the incumbent, George Allen, and changed his positions as he campaigned and began to understand the frustrations of the middle class.

In the presidential race, Kuttner doesn’t see Hilliary and Barack as sufficiently distancing themselves from the power brokers of Wall Street to steer the country in a new direction.

He seems to be encouraged by John Edwards who is not taking money from Wall Street and has accepted public financing of his campaign. I get the feeling that he thinks Edwards has found the right message, but he may not be the right candidate. The $400 haircut problem.

You can read a summary of the book’s chapters or listen to the interview, but whatever you do, realize that until we get the money out of politics, things probably will not change.

 
 Robert Kuttner, Author, The Squadering of America [28:04m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (230)

Salute to Our Veterans and Soldiers: Medal of Honor Recipient Jack H. Jacobs

This Veteran’s Day interview with Jack H. Jacobs, Medal of Honor recipient, says it all.

Jack’s story is on page 138 of “Medal of Honor: Portraits of Valor Beyond the Call of Duty.” “Medal of Honor” is a collection of the personal stories of over a hundred recipients of the Medal of Honor. A DVD is also included in this latest printing.

Listen to the interview or read the book. I can’t do justice in print.

 
 Jack H. Jacobs, Medal of Honor Recipient [28:04m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (174)

The Cost of the War: Watch This Video!

It is the day before Veteran’s Day. Most of us do not have a clue what war is. Hundreds of thousands of American men and women have voluntarily exposed themselves to the risk of war. Regardless of your position on the war, I think it only fitting to salute each and everyone of them, together with their families, who have paid a personal price that we cannot even imagine.

According to the National Priorities Project, the cost today is about $467,760,000,000.00 in round numbers.

That would have:

1. insured 280,000,000 children for 1 year;
2. provided 22,676,000 four-year college scholarships;
3. hired 8,106,000 public school teachers.

And then there is the cost in men and women. According to Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America the Official Department of Defense Count through November 7, 2007 is:

Troops Killed in Iraq: 3843
Troops Killed in Afghanistan: 454
Wounded in Action: 30205

And this doesn’t even consider those sustaining the non-obvious brain injury or PTSD. More from IAVA regarding mental health issues:

At least one-in-three Iraq veterans and one-in-nine Afghanistan veterans will face a mental health issue like depression, anxiety, or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Multiple tours and inadequate rest between deployments have increased the stress of combat. PTSD rates for Iraq veterans are already higher than the rates recorded among veterans of Vietnam.

These mental health problems exact a severe toll on military families; rates of marital stress, substance abuse, and suicide have all increased. The Army has seen an almost three-fold increase in “alcohol- related incidents” between 2005 and 2006. And tens of thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have been treated at a VA hospital for drug or alcohol abuse.

The response to the crisis by the Defense Department has been inadequate. 90% of military psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers reported no formal training or supervision in the recommended PTSD therapies, and there is a general shortage of trained mental health professionals in the military. The Pentagon screens returning troops for mental health problems via an ineffective system of paperwork. Studies have shown that many troops are not filling out their mental health forms, that there are serious disincentives for troops to fill the form out accurately, and that those whose forms indicate they need care do not consistently get referrals.

The Veterans Affairs health care system has been flooded by new veterans seeking care. As of September 2006, almost 700,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are eligible for health care through the Veterans Affairs system, and about 1/3 of these veterans have already sought VA care. More than 36% of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who visited a VA hospital for any reason were given a possible mental disorder diagnosis. At least 45,521 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans had been treated for possible PTSD at a VA hospital or Vet Center. Of course, these numbers do not include those who have only sought mental health care outside of the VA, or those veterans with mental health problems who have not sought treatment.

Massive miscalculations by the VA have dramatically worsened the mental health crisis. In February 2006, the VA claimed it was expecting only 2,900 new veteran PTSD cases in FY 2006. The actual number is likely to be about six times that: 17,827 new veterans got an initial PTSD diagnosis. The VA has also consistently failed to spend the money it has been allotted for mental health care. In 2005 and 2006, the VA failed to spend a total of $100 million dollars earmarked by Congress for mental health care.

And then there are traumatic brain injuries:

Traumatic Brain Injury, or TBI, is the signature wound of the Iraq War. Blasts from mortar attacks or roadside bombs cause the brain to hit the inside of the skull, and the resulting damage can lead to emotional problems; vision, hearing, or speech problems; dizziness; and memory loss. Brain injuries can accumulate if troops are exposed to multiple blasts during their deployment. In severe cases, TBI causes brain damage and requires a lifetime of care and rehabilitation. For more information, see the IAVA report: “Mental Health Problems among Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans.”

TBI is invisible, and often goes undiagnosed and untreated. Based on existing data, veterans’ advocates believe that between 10 and 20% of Iraq veterans, or 150,000 and 300,000 people, have some level of TBI. Among wounded troops, the rate of TBI rises to 33%.

Say a prayer for us all!

Why The Hell is Gas So High?

I know I am being screwed, I am just not sure by who. Anyway, I Googled the above question and found out I am not the only one that is mad. A lot of people are mad.

But, I did find this post on The Consumerist offering an explanation. It is a little long and for all I know it could be the product of the oil industry.

Georgia PorkBusters: Where Does Your Money Go?

In case you haven’t seen it already, here’s a video you should watch. After all, its your money. Visit Georgia Porkbusters

A Doctor’s View of Iraq: A Veterans’ Day Reflection!

I wish I could say that this interview had some relation to Veterans’ Day which is coming up Monday, but I am afraid I did not remember this. Nevertheless, the interview is a timely reminder of the sacrifice our soldiers and their families make every day the service separates them from their home.

Dr. Wayne Mosely is an orthopedic surgeon who practices medicine here in Vidalia. Or at least, he did. His practice has been interupted somewhat in the last few years due to his 4 tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. He just returned a few weeks ago from his 4th tour. He must like the place because he then returned to Iraq as a civilian to attend a medical conference on amputees.

At the beginning of the interview I asked Dr. Mosely to confirm or deny recent rumors that he might offer himself as a Republican candidate for Congress from the 12th District, opposing John Barrow in ‘08. His response: he has not made a decision.Although the Army is in critical need of orthopedic surgeons, Dr. Mosely operated a hospital in his last tour of duty. I did not realize it but the U.S. takes care of the Iraqi civilians and Iraqi military just like they do American soldiers. In fact, most of the patients, over 90% are Iraqis.

The Iraq people are just plain scared on a daily basis because of the ever present danger. He is complementary of the recent efforts of the Iraqi military and is not sure the media is giving them the credit they deserve.He also said that brain injuries in Iraq will be the new “agent orange” of this war. He recommends the purple heart for soldiers who may not have an obvious injury but who have had their brains rattled by the shock of an IED.

Dr. Mosely had some interesting things to say about the Kurds. He said that some 20,000 people have moved from the South of Iraq to Kurdish territory in the North because of the perception that the Kurds know how to govern. He also said the Kurds were the largest ethnic group in the world without a homeland, even larger than the Palestinians.

He also told me that there is a town in Northern Iraq that is building, building, building. And it has an airport with the longest runway in the world. Why so long? Because they want to be a potential landing site for the Space Shuttle, if and when Iraq becomes stable.

He also talks about the hundreds and thousands of Iraqis who are amputees, both from the ravages of Saddam and from this war. He and others are trying to help the people in the local towns and cities deal with these special needs. He spoke of one young girl that he helped get fitted for a prosthesis and told me that one of the problems is that there are no addresses in Iraq. No addresses! No Post Office. No mail delivery. He can’t just mail her supplies. He has to know someone who know someone.

The things that struck me most were Dr. Mosely’s comments about the Iraqi people. He has treated a lot of them and has come to know their families. They want many of the same things we want, but have been brutalized by Saddam. He indicates that every family in Iraq lost someone to Saddam’s reign of terror. They want their country to be successful and peaceful. But, they have no faith in their national government. They sincerely want a free and democratic society and if they could get rid of about 50,000 people who want the situation to remain violent, they could probably succeed in putting it all together.

After the interview was over, Dr. Mosely also told me something interesting. During one of his trips to Iraq when he was traveling on a non-military plane, he had occassion to sit beside an Arab in full regalia. When the flight attendant asked what he wanted to drink, he resisted the desire to order alcohol out of deference to his neighbor. When the flight attendant asked the Arab what he wanted, the order went out unhesitatingly for “Johnny Walker Black Label.” The Arab turned out to be pretty high up in the military establishment of one of the Arab states. In their subsequent discussion, the Arab advised that he and others in similar positions in the region had consulted with U.S. representatives on numerous occasions before the Iraq war and had advised them on various aspects of the post-war management of Iraq. In the end, all the advice the Arabs offered, the U.S. rejected. Imagine that. One of those recommendations: Come prepared to stay a long time as an occupying force and do not rush to create an independent, democratic, self-sufficient government because it won’t happen.

Regardless of what any of us might think about the war, anyone in uniform deserves our respect and support. Remember a veteran Monday! Actually, remember a veteran everyday.

 
 Dr. Wayne Mosely, Orthopedic Surgeon, Georgia National Guard [27:03m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (191)

Sen. Jeff Chapman’s Report to the Oversight Committee: Jekyll Island!

Sen. Jeff Chapman (R-3) isn’t one of the legislators designated as a member of the Jekyll Island Authority Advisory Board, but as he points out, this State owned island is in his district, his constituents have a great interest in what happens there and he is concerned about some of the recent actions of the Authority.

There are two aspects of the current controversy surrounding the Jekyll Island Authority (JIA). In September 2007 the JIA selected Linger Longer as its Revitalization Partner to design and develop a new 45 acre (or is it 63) tract with hotels, motels and all the things that go with them. The only problem, as discussed in my interview with Wade Shealy, in selecting Linger Longer the JIA engaged in some sleazy tricks that appear to have been intended to benefit a particular Republican contributor and which also appear to have violated the law. In the very least, the JIA tarnished its status and justified criticism that it was acting unfairly and arbitrarily.

Sen. Chapman left the issues surrounding the bidding process to be resolved between the JIA and the Jekyll Island Revitalization Group, whether in or outside of court.

His concern is a little more fundamental. Regardless of who was selected as the Revitalization Patner, Senator Chapman is concerned about the nature of the development being contemplated by the JIA. To understand his concerns you can listen to the interview or you can read his letter of November 5, 2007 to the Oversight Committee of the Legislature.

When you talk about Jekyll Island there is one distinguishing factor which you have to keep in mind: the State of Georgia owns it. We, the people, own it. It is for us, for all of us, for the rich, for the poor, for the old couple that wants to drive to the beach and sit in the sand for a few hours, and for the couple with 5 kids that can’t afford a trip this year, but can entertain the kids at the Jekyll beach where the sand is wet, the water salty and the waves mesmerizing.

The JIA seems to be focused on turning Jekyll Island into a money making venture which simply means nothing cheap, nothing affordable (or very little), nothing inviting to the good old, average Georgian.

And then there is that view of the ocean. Just as soon as you get to the end of the entrance road, you turn to the left and there it is. The ocean, the waves, that sound! And, it goes on and on and on. When I was a kid it was 3 zillion miles from that first view of the ocean to the hotel! It is public and it is big and it is accessible. In contrast, go ride around St. Simons and count the number of times you can see the beach. You can hardly find the beach unless you are at a hotel.

Senator Chapman points out in his letter that several actions of the JIA appear to be

inconsistent with the park’s statutory purpose as a public facility set aside for the benefit of “the plain people” of Georgia.

And what is it that the JIA has done?

1. The possible violation of a constitutional prohibition against granting gratuities, including the forgiveness of a public debt as a result of the JIA “…granting a rent abatement estimated to be in excess of $10,000,000 to Trammell Crow and Partners…”

A similar possible violation of the gratuities prohibition by the JIA’s acceptance of “Linger Longer’s proposal for a combination of general obligation and revenue bonds totaling $84,500,000 to cover infrastructure costs associated with the proposed town center.”

2. An expressed intent by the JIA to make sure that ocean view rooms are not affordable by the average Georgian by allowing developers to charge what the market will bear and letting the “not so rich” go elsewhere if they can’t pay the bill. Senator Chapman notes:

This kind of thinking is reflected in policy shown by the Board’s approval of the replacement of the affordable Buccaneer Resort by Trammell Crow and partners, where room rates averaged $89 per night during the years 2002-2006, with a 540-room upscale hotel, where room rates will average double that amount in the off-season and $250 per night during the summer months. Add to these 540 rooms the 400 high-end rooms proposed by Linger Longer for its Jekyll town center, along with the 157 existing rooms at the upscale Jekyll Island Club Hotel, and the park will have well over half of its lodgings priced beyond the means of most Georgians.

3. “The Board is currently considering a proposal by Linger Longer Communities which calls for a beachside Jekyll town center that would result in the elimination of the state park’s most popular oceanfront public parking lots.”

4. “The Board has failed to take into account the environmental impact of a beachside community of the scale proposed by Linger Longer.”

5. “The proposed Jekyll town center includes 14 acres, currently designated as a “nature preserve,” that lie within the park’s 65% protected zone. Acceptance of all or any part of this segment of the proposal would require a redrawing of the existing 65/35 map and would constitute an amendment of the park’s Master Plan. Accordingly, the Authority would have to comply with sections 12-3-243.1 of the GA Code (see Attachment B) beginning with the submission of “a complete copy of the proposed amendment to the Speaker of the House, President of the Senate, members of the Jekyll Island State Park Authority Oversight Committee, and Office of Legislative Counsel at least 60 days prior to the date of the meeting at which the proposed amendment will be considered.”

Senator Chapman suggests several recommendations for the Oversight Committee’s consideration:

1. Seek an Official Opinion of the Attorney General on the question of the power of the Jekyll Island Authority to grant rent abatements or other subsidies to persons and corporations leasing property in the State Park from the Authority. Included among such subsidies the Attorney General should be asked about: a) the Constitutionality of a sale of bonds by the Jekyll Island Authority at the prescription of a party to whom the Authority is leasing property, when the proceeds of the sale of such bonds is to be used for the improvement of that leased property, and b) the legality of granting a rent abatement to a party for hotel redevelopment on nine acres of prime oceanfront property in light of OCGA 12-3-271, which calls for the Jekyll Island Authority to develop the park “at the lowest rates reasonable and possible for the benefit of the people of the State of Georgia.”
2. Seek an Official Opinion of the Attorney General in regard to that portion of the GA Code OCGA 121-3-235(14), calling for Jekyll Island State Park to be available to and affordable for people of average income, specifically in light of the Authority’s failure to exercise its power in behalf of the interests of Georgians “of average income” in its pursuit of the redevelopment of the hotel and other lodging facilities at Jekyll Island State Park.
3. Seek an Official Opinion of the Attorney General in regard to the applicability of the Environmental Policy Act, OCGA 12-16-1 et. seq., to the actions of the Jekyll Island Authority, specifically its duty to prepare an “environmental effects report” pursuant to that statute’s requirements.
4. Notify the Board of the Jekyll Island Authority of its duty to conform to the provisions of OCGA 12-3-243.1, in which notice of changes to the Master Plan for Jekyll Island must be submitted to the Overview Committee.

While the JIA apparently has some autonomy in ruling Jekyll Island, I certainly hope that the Oversight Committee flexes its muscles and imposes the will of the people of Georgia. The Governor appoints the members of the JIA, they aren’t elected. But those elected officials that can fix this, ought to and if they don’t that is what elections are for. If you think the JIA is on the wrong road, you can notify the members of the Authority Board, or Governor Perdue, or Sen. Tommie Williams (R-19) who is a Senate member of the Oversight Committee or Senator Chapman.

Let’s hope that Jekyll’s great view of the ocean is preserved for our kids and grandchildren!

 
 Sen. Jeff Chapman (R-3), Jekyll Island Report [29:15m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (308)

GriftDrift Says It All: Holy Water on a Vampire!

What do you not talk about when you talk to James Williams a/k/a GriftDrift? From water rationing to development to the ‘08 Senate race to presidential politics, we cover the gamut, including holy water and vampires.

As you may know, Governor Perdue was in DC last week meeting with the Secretary of the Interior in an effort to resolve the water war with Alabama and Florida. As James points out, the farmers in South Georgia have known there was a water crisis for years. However, the farmers (developers) in Atlanta probably knew the problem existed and was much worse than the general public was aware. They just didn’t want to deal with the issue because any legitimate discussion of the future of water in Atlanta should include a discussion about controlling development. As James notes, talking about restricting development in Atlanta is like throwing holy water on a vampire.

The problem with the water crisis is the worst is yet to come! The economic impact of water rationing could impact North and South Georgia. Water restrictions have already had an impact on those businesses whose economic viability depends on water and plenty of it. The question is how long can they hold on before they go under, file bankruptcy or otherwise significantly impact employment levels. The sad truth is that there probably is no solution that can be put into effect in time to solve the problem unless the rain returns and soon.

A few comments about Rep. Jim Marshall (GA 8th) and his recent vote against SCHIP funding. Marshall is apparently confusing the Democrats with his Republican leaning votes. According to James, Marshall probably believes the program is a good one, but just doesn’t need the level of funding the Democrats are pushing. Either way he is confounding both parties.

As for the Senate race, Chambliss is polling at 58% according to the most recent Strategic Vision poll. I wonder if the election will end up being a referendum on Chambliss’ unwavering support for Bush and the Iraq War.

As for the Democrats, of course, Vernon Jones, the DeKalb County CEO, is ahead of the pack in fund raising. Some people think he already has it sown up, but Josh Lanier from Statesboro, a Talmadge Democrat, has recently formed a committee to look into the possibility of making a run.

As for presidential politics, Hillary is the Democratic favorite in Georgia, Thompson the Republican. Hillary does appear to have sown up the Georgia vote recently getting Civil Rights leader Rep. John Lewis’ endorsement.

James thinks Romney will ultimately win the Republican nomination. If it ends up with two New Yorkers, Hillary and Rudy, opposing each other, the question may be how many Georgia voters will just stay home during the primary. None I hope. However, by the date of the Georgia primary on February 5th, the winner of both the Democratic and Republican nominations may be sown up.

Fred Thompson appears to be the dog that caught the car and now that he has it, doesn’t know what to do with it. While Thompson may still be the number one choice of Georgia Republicans, I think he has little chance of getting the nomination. One minute Fred sounds great and the next he looks old. As James points out, Fred is a good example of the difference between the type of politician we say we want and the type we will actually vote for. We don’t want Slick Willie until we see unslick Willie and then we prefer the slick one.

Let’s face it. In these days and times, politics makes little sense, but it is even more important to be involved.

At least capitalism is still alive, even if it is thirsty. James and I are both thinking about renting out our trailer (mine) and cabin (James) to people from North Georgia that might want to move someplace where they can take a bath 3 or 4 times a day and not worry about running out of water.

 
 James Williams, GriftDrift [27:34m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (219)