canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england canada pharmacy fast delivery for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa lowest price mail order mexico obtain fast delivery uk on the internet online ordering canada purchasing shipped to australia without prescription uk for sale buy from canada buy legal online buy online in britain buy without prescription buying cheap rx without a prescreption cheaper price for how can i obtain legal uk mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees refill your rx net shopping online pharmacy uk toronto rx meds pill were can i buy in england


Levitra instead of such famous love-drug Viagra?canadarxgeneric.com

Monthly Archive for July, 2007

Read the Lozano v Hazelton Decision…

All 206 pages of it.

While the folks who support immigration reform are claiming victory, remember, this is not a final decision. It will be appealed to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the loser there will almost certainly ask the Supreme Court to hear the case. To do so, they will apply for a writ of certiorari following the decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeal.

On a scale of 1 to 10 in the course of federal litigation, a favorable ruling at this level is virtually meaningless. While it is emotionally uplifting to win at any level, any attorney who knows anything about litigation, especially in federal court, would not feel particularly comforted by the decision.

Message to both sides: You have your work cut out for you!!

Interview with Congressman John Barrow (D-GA 12)

Congressman Barrow discusses the Democrats and the War in Iraq, the 2007 Farm Bill and legislation to help veterans.

 
 Congressman John Barrow (D-12) [27:25m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (564)

If You Are Not a Republican, You Need to Read “The Political Brain!”

In the near future I will be interviewing Drew Westin, Author of “The Political Brain.” If you have any interest in voting trends and why people vote the way they do, this book is a must.

Believe it or not, Drew is a professsor at Emory University.

If you want to have some understanding why Democrats, the Democratic Party, have such a wimpy, weak reputation, you need to read this book.

If you wonder why an American worker earning minimum wage would vote Republican, read the book.

If you want to analyze political ads for the last 45 years and understand why they work or didn’t work, read the book.

If you want to know “What Happened to Kansas?” read the book.

If you want to know the relationship between reason and emotion, read the book.

If you want to know these things without reading the book, listen to the interview. Coming soon!

Would I Vote for Impeachment?

I just happen to be in Jackson Hole, Wyoming getting ready for a deposition. There is an HBO special playing consisting of interviews with families who have lost husbands and wives, sons and daughters, fathers and mothers in Iraq. These are tear-jerkers of the most tear-jerking kind. A recent phone call, a letter home, and a day later two people in uniform show up at the door. Lives destroyed, dreams sacrificed and hope shattered.

It looks like the show may be several years old, but the war is still there, deaths continue, and families still have the sad, sad stories. Unimaginable sadness.

And then I think of the lies, the deception, the secret agendas, the WMDs, the arrogance, the bigotry, the “little general”, the surge smokescreen.

Yeah, I could probably vote for impeachment.

After all, impeachment means only there is a trial. I would like a trial. Definitely!

Interview with Dr. Carol Couch, Director, Georgia EPD About the Georgia Water Plan

Dr. Carol Couch, as Director of the EPD, is also the head of the Georgia Water Council which published its draft State Water Plan in June. I was (and still am) concerned about, not only the proposed plan, but the way Georgia is going to get a water plan, want it or not.The 2004 Act which mandates develop of the plan, also provides that if the legislature doesn’t pass some plan, then the one proposed by the Water Council becomes law by default. I neither like nor understand laws like that.

The Water Council is composed of 3 advisory committees: Statewide Advisory Committee, Basin Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee.

The main thing I wanted to ask Dr. Couch concerned interbasin piping. Interbasin piping takes water from one drainage basin and pumps it to another drainage basin. Why? I assume because development, growth, business, wants to use more water than is available in a particular location. According to Dr. Couch there is no such thing as interbasin piping in Georgia. It doesn’t happen and isn’t likely to happen. That’s encouraging!

And for those who worry about their water being sent off to Atlanta, according to Dr. Couch it is already illegal to pipe water in the Atlanta Metro Area.

There are interbasin transfers (apparently a lot of them) which generally occur when a city, such as Atlanta and others, grow and develop in more than one drainage basin. Water would be withdrawn from one basin for use (drinking, yard, sewage) and ends up being discharged (water treatment plant) into a diffierent basin. As I understand it, the goal is to try and minimize such transfers from becoming worse and maybe even reverse the process in some areas.

There are a lot of issues when it comes to water and water use. South Georgia sits on the Floridan aquifer and has plenty of water (don’t tell anyone!), but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t need to be managed, conserved and protected. Above the fall line, most water usage comes from surface water: rivers, lakes and reservoirs. According to Dr. Couch we have plenty of water available, just not necessarily in the place people need it or want it.

Water is a complicated issue and I certainly do not have a handle on it. (I think we are still at war with Alabama and Florida over water.) I just put in a new well to water my yard and I felt a little guilty until the octogenarian drilling the well told me there was and always would be plenty of water, at least in Georgia south of the fall line. He also told me somthing like this: it takes 100 years for the subterranean water in the limestone to flow from Macon to Vidalia. Now that is some slow moving water!

You might want to listen to my interview a few months ago with Gordon Rogers, the Executive Director of the Satilla Riverkeeper. I also discussed it with Senate Majority Leader Tommie Williams just after the plan was unveiled.

Also, you might want to read Sally Bethea’s (Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper) recent editorial on the Water Plan.

If you really want to participate you can register on the Water Council website and submit your own comments and suggestions.

 
 Dr. Carol Couch [29:59m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (544)

Interview with Amber Rhea and Rusty Tanton, Georgia Podcast Network and Web Developers

I know you have all been waiting for the interview of the season (which season I ain’t sure) but here it is. Naturally, trying to get a podcast posted becomes impossible when it is a podcast about podcasting. It became a real techno challenge because immediately following their interview I went out of town, got ill overnight, drove a thousand miles, misplaced the thingy (techno for “that over there”) that lets me get an interview from my old PC to my new MAC, failed to be able to do something simple like copy the MP3 to a CD, and so here it is 4 days later. My apologies to Ambrea and Ruton.

All kidding aside, I am so proud of the new website Amber and Rusty developed for What Is Goin On? that all I can add is that it is a pleasure to have a small, very small, part to play in this new media wave. It is still very much over my head, but discussing it with knowledgeable people like Amber and Rusty at least makes me feel like any of us can participate and make a difference.

The interview itself covers a lot of territory from Shelbinator at the CNN/YouTube Debates Monday night to the surprise in the 10th District Congressional race.

It is a great world of citizen activists out there. As soon as I figure out how to operate the MAC, I am going video. BTW, Rusty could you answer that last email I sent you, you know the one with the 123 addtional questions!

 
 Rusty Tanton and Amber Rhea [29:06m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (552)

Interview with Fred Rosen, Author of “there but for the Grace of God”

Fred Rosen, a true crime author, writes about survivors of serial killers in “there but for the Grace of God.” Frankly, I did not know anyone survived serial killers, but apparently they do. It kind of gives you the creeps when Fred talks about the young girl who almost walked into the room with Ted Bundy, but instead turned and walked away. It still changed her life.

From Bundy, to Son of Sam, to BTK, to Dahmer, Fred tells amazing stories, one after another. I mean think about Kevin Bright who was shot in the head twice by the BTK killer and refused to die, while living through the brutal murder of his sister in the next room.

Read at your own risk.

 
 Fred Rosen [29:07m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (577)

What Kind of Questions Will the Republicans Get?

I don’t know why I have to wait 45+ days to see the Republicans debate.

Also, am I the only one who thought most of the questions were from a Democratic perspective.

I think in 4 years they should have the two debates back to back and ask the Democrats the questions submitted for the Republican debate and vice versa. They could draw (whatever you draw) and pair up the candidates, Democractic and Republican. For example, a question intended for Rudy would be answered by Hillary.

If there were more candidates debating for one party than the other, then the candidate with the lowest polling percentages in the party with less condidates would get to decide whether he answered the extra questions or passed it to the frontrunner.

I would be interesting.

History Repeats Itself: Welcome Back FDR!

A few weeks ago, Jason Pye, the Libertarian, and I were swapping observations about politics. I don’t remember the details but he asked me to read a book: “FDR’s Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression” by Jim Powell. I think I asked him to read Al Gore’s “The Assault on Reason.” Well, Jason, it was a great read!

I think it pretty clear that Powell did not write the book as an objective history. He had an agenda. Some people think he is right on, and others biased. I can’t resolve that debate, but I think the book makes a lot of valid points (assuming Powell did not just make the stuff up), but the overall point of the book is this (seems to me): Ideology produces bad governments.

I wonder if Jason wanted me to read the book to dampen my hopes of a Democratic majority in Congress accomplishing anything. Failed there Jason. All I have to do is remember that the alternative party is, in my opinion, the worst at governing of any party at any time in American history. In fact, the book absolutely, positively, reinforced my beliefs about the end course of Republican policies: catastrophe for the American economy, less freedom for the American people and more and more money, control and power in the hands of the lobbyists and the special interests they represent.

I have to admit that I tend to be naive, sometimes just plain stupid. I have a natural tendency to believe people tell the truth. (I mean it took a dozen years of practicing law to realize that most clients were lying when they told me they had no idea why their spouse wanted a divorce.) My point is that reading this book persuaded me that FDR and his administration were not the saviors of America with innovative and controversial ideas and programs to get America back to work, to recover economically, and provide ordinary people with the opportunity to attain the Amercian dream, whatever they thought that meant to them.

The books makes a convincing case for the proposition that during FDR’s 13 years in power, he and his cronies had an agenda that would surprise most Americans, particularly today’s Americans. According to the book (and I believe it true) FDR and his advisors used the Depression, the Great Depression, as a watershed event to justify an attack on free enterprise, big business, small business, all business and expand the idea of government control and regulation to unbelievable heights (or is it depths!).

According to the book, these Democrats adopted policies which achieved the opposite of the desired results. In an effort to put people back to work, they raised taxes on businesses, and decreased incentives to make money which resulted in less business expansion and fewer people being hired.

They did crazy things. Like forbidding businesses from cutting prices, ordering excess agricultural produce (milk, for example) destroyed even though people (children) were going to bed hungry. Bloggers would have had a wonderful time back in those days.

Why did they do these things? I know that can be debated but the book makes a convincing argument that it was because the men that created and operated these “recovery” programs, Roosevelt’s advisors, believed that Big Business was the primary cause of the depression, that business as a whole was bad, that the American economy needed to be planned and regulated to bring about a redistrubution of money from the rich to the less than rich. I could go on and on.

The point is that ideology prevailed, while certain freedoms and individual initiative took a back seat to regulation. The views and sympathies of a small group of people took over the legislative and executive branches of government. They were able to do so because everyone believed the Depression was no less a national emergency than war. They played on American’s fears, while offering deceptive consolation. Dissent was un-American. People were prosecuted for lowering the price of washing clothes! Nuts!!

And they did it all right in front of Americans. Fireside chats mesmerized our minds. I think FDR invented sound bites. FDR was loved by the commnon man because the common man did not know what he was doing. Americans believed what they were told, hook, line and sinker. They believed that there was no way their leaders would lie to them, deceive them or promote agendas detrimental to Amercian principles.

Enter 911, George Bush and the Republicans. Does this sound familiar? Hello!!!!!!

Read the book. If anyone has any information that the factual assertions in the book are not accurate, let me know.

Interview with Rebecca Mead, Author of “One Perfect Day: The Selling of the American Wedding”

If you are planning on getting married, you owe it to yourself to read “One Perfect Day.” It might be the best investment you ever made, as well as the cheapest item in the wedding plan. Rebecca Mead seeks to understand the national compulsion to go all out to make a one-day, fifteen minute experience last for years–in paying for it!

The average American wedding now costs about $28,000. That is about 7 1/2 months of the median income today. The industry takes in $161 billion annually. And it is not necessarily paid in cash. Credit cards, home equity loans, and other inventive financing arrangements make it all possible. People are now saving for their children’s weddings just as they would for their college education. Wedding planners have taken over the traditiional role of bride, mother and that special friend who helps. No doubt todays weddings are such extravaganzas that without a wedding planner, the bride might not make it to that perfect day.

Do you know what the “Oh Mommy!” Moment is? Rebecca’s book attempts to provide the future bride and groom (and probably their parents as well) with some practical pointers in avoiding getting sucked in to the role of Brides Gone Wild a/k/a Bridezilla!

 
 Rebecca Mead [28:17m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (522)